Naive Set Theory - Unions, Intersections, and Relative Complements

Unions, Intersections, and Relative Complements

Given two sets A and B, we may construct their union. This is the set consisting of all objects which are elements of A or of B or of both (see axiom of union). It is denoted by AB.

The intersection of A and B is the set of all objects which are both in A and in B. It is denoted by AB.

Finally, the relative complement of B relative to A, also known as the set theoretic difference of A and B, is the set of all objects that belong to A but not to B. It is written as A \ B or AB.

Symbolically, these are respectively

A ∪ B := {x : (xA) or (xB)};
AB := {x : (xA) and (xB)} = {xA : xB} = {xB : xA};
A \ B := {x : (xA) and not (xB) } = {xA : not (xB)}.

Notice that A doesn't have to be a subset of B for B \ A to make sense; this is the difference between the relative complement and the absolute complement from the previous section.

To illustrate these ideas, let A be the set of left-handed people, and let B be the set of people with blond hair. Then AB is the set of all left-handed blond-haired people, while AB is the set of all people who are left-handed or blond-haired or both. A \ B, on the other hand, is the set of all people that are left-handed but not blond-haired, while B \ A is the set of all people who have blond hair but aren't left-handed.

Now let E be the set of all human beings, and let F be the set of all living things over 1000 years old. What is EF in this case? No living human being is over 1000 years old, so EF must be the empty set {}.

For any set A, the power set is a Boolean algebra under the operations of union and intersection.

Read more about this topic:  Naive Set Theory

Famous quotes containing the word relative:

    Are not all finite beings better pleased with motions relative than absolute?
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)