Complex Case
If G is a complex semisimple Lie group, it is the complexification of its maximal compact subgroup K. If and are their Lie algebras, then
Let T be a maximal torus in K with Lie algebra . Then
Let
be the Weyl group of T in K. Recall characters in Hom(T,T) are called weights and can be identified with elements of the weight lattice Λ in Hom(, R) = . There is a natural ordering on weights and very finite-dimensional irreducible representation (π, V) of K has a unique highest weight λ. The weights of the adjoint representation of K on are called roots and ρ is used to denote half the sum of the positive roots α, Weyl's character formula asserts that for z = exp X in T
where, for μ in, Aμ denotes the antisymmetrisation
and ε denotes the sign character of the finite reflection group W.
Weyl's denominator formula expresses the denominator Aρ as a product:
where the product is over the positive roots.
Weyl's dimension formula asserts that
where the inner product on is that associated with the Killing form on .
Now
- every irreducible representation of K extends holomorphically to the complexification G
- every irreducible character χλ(k) of K extends holomorphically to the complexification of K and .
- for every λ in Hom(A,T) =, there is a zonal spherical function φλ.
The Berezin–Harish–Chandra formula asserts that for X in
In other words:
- the zonal spherical functions on a complex semisimple Lie group are given by analytic continuation of the formula for the normalised characters.
One of the simplest proofs of this formula involves the radial component on A of the Laplacian on G, a proof formally parallel to Helgason's reworking of Freudenthal's classical proof of the Weyl character formula, using the radial component on T of the Laplacian on K.
In the latter case the class functions on K can be identified with W-invariant functions on T. The radial component of ΔK on T is just the expression for the restriction of ΔK to W-invariant functions on T, where it is given by the formula
where
for X in . If χ is a character with highest weight λ, it follows that φ = h·χ satisfies
Thus for every weight μ with non-zero Fourier coefficient in φ,
The classical argument of Freudenthal shows that μ + ρ must have the form s(λ + ρ) for some s in W, so the character formula follows from the antisymmetry of φ.
Similarly K-biinvariant functions on G can be identified with W(A)-invariant functions on A. The radial component of ΔG on A is just the expression for the restriction of ΔG to W(A)-invariant functions on A. It is given by the formula
where
for X in .
The Berezin–Harish–Chandra formula for a zonal spherical function φ can be established by introducing the antisymmetric function
which is an eigenfunction of the Laplacian ΔA. Since K is generated by copies of subgroups that are homomorphic images of SU(2) corresponding to simple roots, its complexification G is generated by the corresponding homomorphic images of SL(2,C). The formula for zonal spherical functions of SL(2,C) implies that f is a periodic function on with respect to some sublattice. Antisymmetry under the Weyl group and the argument of Freudenthal again imply that ψ must have the stated form up to a multiplicative constant, which can be determined using the Weyl dimension formula.
Read more about this topic: Zonal Spherical Function
Famous quotes containing the words complex and/or case:
“Young children constantly invent new explanations to account for complex processes. And since their inventions change from week to week, furnishing the correct explanation is not quite so important as conveying a willingness to discuss the subject. Become an askable parent.”
—Ruth Formanek (20th century)
“... business training in early life should not be regarded solely as insurance against destitution in the case of an emergency. For from business experience women can gain, too, knowledge of the world and of human beings, which should be of immeasurable value to their marriage careers. Self-discipline, co-operation, adaptability, efficiency, economic management,if she learns these in her business life she is liable for many less heartbreaks and disappointments in her married life.”
—Hortense Odlum (1892?)