Science Bowl - Results of The National Competition

Results of The National Competition

The top four teams (out of 69) at the 2012 National Science Bowl were

  1. Lexington High School (Lexington, Massachusetts)
  2. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  3. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  4. Morgantown High School (Morgantown, West Virginia)

The top four teams (out of 69) at the 2011 National Science Bowl were

  1. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  2. Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  3. Sunset High School (Portland, Oregon)
  4. Hunter College High School (New York City)

The top four teams (out of 68) at the 2010 National Science Bowl were

  1. North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics (Durham, North Carolina)
  2. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  3. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  4. Arcadia High School (Arcadia, California)

The top four teams (out of 67) at the 2009 National Science Bowl were

  1. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  2. Lexington High School (Lexington, Massachusetts)
  3. Oak Ridge High School (Oak Ridge, Tennessee)
  4. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)

The full double elimination bracket for the 2009 tournament is shown below:

The top four teams (out of 67) at the 2008 National Science Bowl were

  1. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)
  2. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  3. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  4. Fairview High School (Boulder, Colorado)

The top four teams (out of 64) at the 2007 National Science Bowl were

  1. Poudre High School (Fort Collins, Colorado)
  2. State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania)
  3. East Chapel Hill High School (Chapel Hill, North Carolina)
  4. Miami Palmetto Senior High School (Pinecrest, Florida)

The top four teams (out of 65) at the 2006 National Science Bowl were

  1. State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania)
  2. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  3. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)
  4. Albany High School (Albany, California)

The top five teams (out of 63) at the 2005 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Mission San Jose High School (Fremont, California)
  3. George Walton Comprehensive High School (Marietta, Georgia)
  4. Miami Palmetto Senior High School (Pinecrest, Florida)
  5. Thomas S. Wootton High School (Rockville, Maryland)

The top five teams (out of 64) at the 2004 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. A&M Consolidated High School (College Station, Texas)
  3. Baton Rouge Magnet High School (Baton Rouge, Louisiana)
  4. Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  5. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)

The full double elimination bracket from the 2004 competition is shown below. The bracket was unseeded (as in most years), i.e. positions in the draw were chosen randomly among qualifying teams. Red numbers are not seed numbers, but match numbers to be used for reference in the bottom half of the bracket (the loser's bracket).

The top five teams (out of 66) at the 2003 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Centerville High School (Centerville, Ohio)
  3. A&M Consolidated High School (College Station, Texas)
  4. Taylor Allderdice High School (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)
  5. Cincinnati Country Day School (Cincinnati, Ohio)

The full double elimination bracket from the 2003 competition is shown below. The bracket was unseeded (as in most years), i.e. positions in the draw were chosen randomly among qualifying teams. Red numbers are not seed numbers, but match numbers to be used for reference in the bottom half of the bracket (the loser's bracket).

The top five teams (out of 64) at the 2002 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Boulder High School (Boulder, Colorado)
  3. Mission San Jose High School (Fremont, California) (note: this is the correct spelling of Fremont. The NSB website gives "Freemont".)
  4. Sycamore High School (Cincinnati, Ohio)
  5. Hanford High School (Richland, Washington)

The winning teams from the years 1991-2001 (number of teams participating in parentheses):

  • 2001 (61 teams) North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  • 2000 (60 teams) duPont Manual High School (Louisville, Kentucky)
  • 1999 (53 teams) Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  • 1998 (48 teams) Valley High School (West Des Moines, Iowa)
  • 1997 (45 teams) Venice High School (Los Angeles)
  • 1996 (53 teams) Venice High School (Los Angeles)
  • 1995 (55 teams) Van Nuys High School (Van Nuys, California)
  • 1994 (51 teams) Westminster School (Atlanta, Georgia)
  • 1993 (43 teams) Albany High School (Albany, California)
  • 1992 (29 teams) Lubbock High School (Lubbock, Texas)
  • 1991 (18 teams) Lubbock High School (Lubbock, Texas)

Read more about this topic:  Science Bowl

Famous quotes containing the words results of the, results of, results, national and/or competition:

    “Consider what you have in the smallest chosen library. A company of the wisest and wittiest men that could be picked out of all civil countries in a thousand years have set in best order the results of their learning and wisdom. The men themselves were hid and inaccessible, solitary, impatient of interruption, fenced by etiquette; but the thought which they did not uncover in their bosom friend is here written out in transparent words to us, the strangers of another age.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
    —Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)

    “Being a parent is unlike any previous job—the results of any one action are not clearly visible for a long time, if at all.”
    —Anonymous Mother. As quoted in Between Generations by Ellen Galinsky, ch. 2 (1981)

    “Our national experience in Americanizing millions of Europeans whose chief wish was to become Americans has been a heady wine which has made us believe, as perhaps no nation before us has ever believed, that, given the slimmest chance, all peoples will pattern themselves upon our model.”
    —Ruth Benedict (1887–1948)

    “So long as the system of competition in the production and exchange of the means of life goes on, the degradation of the arts will go on; and if that system is to last for ever, then art is doomed, and will surely die; that is to say, civilization will die.”
    —William Morris (1834–1896)