Science Bowl - Results of The National Competition

Results of The National Competition

The top four teams (out of 69) at the 2012 National Science Bowl were

  1. Lexington High School (Lexington, Massachusetts)
  2. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  3. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  4. Morgantown High School (Morgantown, West Virginia)

The top four teams (out of 69) at the 2011 National Science Bowl were

  1. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  2. Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  3. Sunset High School (Portland, Oregon)
  4. Hunter College High School (New York City)

The top four teams (out of 68) at the 2010 National Science Bowl were

  1. North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics (Durham, North Carolina)
  2. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  3. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  4. Arcadia High School (Arcadia, California)

The top four teams (out of 67) at the 2009 National Science Bowl were

  1. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  2. Lexington High School (Lexington, Massachusetts)
  3. Oak Ridge High School (Oak Ridge, Tennessee)
  4. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)

The full double elimination bracket for the 2009 tournament is shown below:

The top four teams (out of 67) at the 2008 National Science Bowl were

  1. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)
  2. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  3. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  4. Fairview High School (Boulder, Colorado)

The top four teams (out of 64) at the 2007 National Science Bowl were

  1. Poudre High School (Fort Collins, Colorado)
  2. State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania)
  3. East Chapel Hill High School (Chapel Hill, North Carolina)
  4. Miami Palmetto Senior High School (Pinecrest, Florida)

The top four teams (out of 65) at the 2006 National Science Bowl were

  1. State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania)
  2. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  3. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)
  4. Albany High School (Albany, California)

The top five teams (out of 63) at the 2005 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Mission San Jose High School (Fremont, California)
  3. George Walton Comprehensive High School (Marietta, Georgia)
  4. Miami Palmetto Senior High School (Pinecrest, Florida)
  5. Thomas S. Wootton High School (Rockville, Maryland)

The top five teams (out of 64) at the 2004 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. A&M Consolidated High School (College Station, Texas)
  3. Baton Rouge Magnet High School (Baton Rouge, Louisiana)
  4. Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  5. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)

The full double elimination bracket from the 2004 competition is shown below. The bracket was unseeded (as in most years), i.e. positions in the draw were chosen randomly among qualifying teams. Red numbers are not seed numbers, but match numbers to be used for reference in the bottom half of the bracket (the loser's bracket).

The top five teams (out of 66) at the 2003 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Centerville High School (Centerville, Ohio)
  3. A&M Consolidated High School (College Station, Texas)
  4. Taylor Allderdice High School (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)
  5. Cincinnati Country Day School (Cincinnati, Ohio)

The full double elimination bracket from the 2003 competition is shown below. The bracket was unseeded (as in most years), i.e. positions in the draw were chosen randomly among qualifying teams. Red numbers are not seed numbers, but match numbers to be used for reference in the bottom half of the bracket (the loser's bracket).

The top five teams (out of 64) at the 2002 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Boulder High School (Boulder, Colorado)
  3. Mission San Jose High School (Fremont, California) (note: this is the correct spelling of Fremont. The NSB website gives "Freemont".)
  4. Sycamore High School (Cincinnati, Ohio)
  5. Hanford High School (Richland, Washington)

The winning teams from the years 1991-2001 (number of teams participating in parentheses):

  • 2001 (61 teams) North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  • 2000 (60 teams) duPont Manual High School (Louisville, Kentucky)
  • 1999 (53 teams) Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  • 1998 (48 teams) Valley High School (West Des Moines, Iowa)
  • 1997 (45 teams) Venice High School (Los Angeles)
  • 1996 (53 teams) Venice High School (Los Angeles)
  • 1995 (55 teams) Van Nuys High School (Van Nuys, California)
  • 1994 (51 teams) Westminster School (Atlanta, Georgia)
  • 1993 (43 teams) Albany High School (Albany, California)
  • 1992 (29 teams) Lubbock High School (Lubbock, Texas)
  • 1991 (18 teams) Lubbock High School (Lubbock, Texas)

Read more about this topic:  Science Bowl

Famous quotes containing the words results of, results, national and/or competition:

    “It is perhaps the principal admirableness of the Gothic schools of architecture, that they receive the results of the labour of inferior minds; and out of fragments full of imperfection ... raise up a stately and unaccusable whole.”
    —John Ruskin (1819–1900)

    “It amazes me when I hear any person prefer blindness to deafness. Such a person must have a terrible dread of being alone. Blindness makes one totally dependent on others, and deprives us of every satisfaction that results from light.”
    —Horace Walpole (1717–1797)

    “The American, if he has a spark of national feeling, will be humiliated by the very prospect of a foreigner’s visit to Congress—these, for the most part, illiterate hacks whose fancy vests are spotted with gravy, and whose speeches, hypocritical, unctuous, and slovenly, are spotted also with the gravy of political patronage, these persons are a reflection on the democratic process rather than of it; they expose it in its process rather than of it; they expose it in its underwear.”
    —Mary McCarthy (1912–1989)

    “Never before has a generation of parents faced such awesome competition with the mass media for their children’s attention. While parents tout the virtues of premarital virginity, drug-free living, nonviolent resolution of social conflict, or character over physical appearance, their values are daily challenged by television soaps, rock music lyrics, tabloid headlines, and movie scenes extolling the importance of physical appearance and conformity.”
    —Marianne E. Neifert (20th century)