Quotient Group - Definition

Definition

Let N be a normal subgroup of a group G. We define the set G/N to be the set of all left cosets of N in G, i.e., G/N = { aN : a in G }. The group operation on G/N is the product of subsets defined above. In other words, for each aN and bN in G/N, the product of aN and bN is (aN)(bN). This operation is closed, because (aN)(bN) really is a left coset:

(aN)(bN) = a(Nb)N = a(bN)N = (ab)NN = (ab)N.

The normality of N is used in this equation. Because of the normality of N, the left cosets and right cosets of N in G are equal, and so G/N could be defined as the set of right cosets of N in G. Because the operation is derived from the product of subsets of G, the operation is well-defined (does not depend on the particular choice of representatives), associative, and has identity element N. The inverse of an element aN of G/N is a−1N.

For example, consider the group with addition modulo 6:

G = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.

Let

N = {0, 3}.

The quotient group is:

G/N = { aN : a ∈ G } = { a{0, 3} : a ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} } =
{ 0{0, 3}, 1{0, 3}, 2{0, 3}, 3{0, 3}, 4{0, 3}, 5{0, 3} } =
{ {(0+0) mod 6, (0+3) mod 6}, {(1+0) mod 6, (1+3) mod 6},
{(2+0) mod 6, (2+3) mod 6}, {(3+0) mod 6, (3+3) mod 6},
{(4+0) mod 6, (4+3) mod 6}, {(5+0) mod 6, (5+3) mod 6} } =
{ {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 0}, {4, 1}, {5, 2} } =
{ {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5} } =
{ {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5} }.

The basic argument above is still valid if G/N is defined to be the set of all right cosets.

Read more about this topic:  Quotient Group

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    No man, not even a doctor, ever gives any other definition of what a nurse should be than this—”devoted and obedient.” This definition would do just as well for a porter. It might even do for a horse. It would not do for a policeman.
    Florence Nightingale (1820–1910)

    One definition of man is “an intelligence served by organs.”
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.
    François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)