Strict and Non-strict Partial Orders
In some contexts, the partial order defined above is called a non-strict (or reflexive, or weak) partial order. In these contexts a strict (or irreflexive) partial order "<" is a binary relation that is irreflexive and transitive, and therefore asymmetric. In other words, asymmetric (hence irreflexive) and transitive.
Thus, for all a, b, and c in P, we have that:
- ¬(a < a) (irreflexivity);
- if a < b then ¬(b < a) (asymmetry); and
- if a < b and b < c then a < c (transitivity).
There is a 1-to-1 correspondence between all non-strict and strict partial orders.
If "≤" is a non-strict partial order, then the corresponding strict partial order "<" is the reflexive reduction given by:
- a < b if and only if (a ≤ b and a ≠ b)
Conversely, if "<" is a strict partial order, then the corresponding non-strict partial order "≤" is the reflexive closure given by:
- a ≤ b if and only if a < b or a = b.
This is the reason for using the notation "≤".
Strict partial orders are useful because they correspond more directly to directed acyclic graphs (dags): every strict partial order is a dag, and the transitive closure of a dag is both a strict partial order and also a dag itself.
Read more about this topic: Partially Ordered Set
Famous quotes containing the words strict, partial and/or orders:
“Compassion is frequently a sense of our own misfortunes, in those of other men; it is an ingenious foresight of the disasters that may fall upon us hereafter. We relieve others, that they may return the like when our occasions call for it; and the good offices we do them are, in strict speaking, so many kindnesses done to ourselves beforehand.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“We were soon in the smooth water of the Quakish Lake,... and we had our first, but a partial view of Ktaadn, its summit veiled in clouds, like a dark isthmus in that quarter, connecting the heavens with the earth.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“There is nothing on earth more exquisite than a bonny book, with well-placed columns of rich black writing in beautiful borders, and illuminated pictures cunningly inset. But nowadays, instead of looking at books, people read them. A book might as well be one of those orders for bacon and bran.”
—George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)