Partial Fractions in Integration - A Repeated Irreducible 2nd-degree Polynomial in The Denominator

A Repeated Irreducible 2nd-degree Polynomial in The Denominator

Next, consider

Just as above, we can split x + 6 into (x − 4) + 10, and treat the part containing x − 4 via the substitution

\begin{align} u & = x^2-8x+25, \\ du & = (2x-8)\,dx, \\ du/2 & = (x-4)\,dx. \end{align}

This leaves us with

As before, we first complete the square and then do a bit of algebraic massaging, to get

\int {10 \over (x^2-8x+25)^{8}}\,dx =\int {10 \over ((x-4)^2+9)^{8}}\,dx =\int {10/9^{8} \over \left(\left({x-4 \over 3}\right)^2+1\right)^8}\,dx.

Then we can use a trigonometric substitution:

Then the integral becomes

\int {30/9^{8} \over \sec^{16}\theta} \sec^2\theta \,d\theta ={30 \over 9^{8}}\int \cos^{14} \theta \, d\theta.

By repeated applications of the half-angle formula

one can reduce this to an integral involving no higher powers of cos θ higher than the 1st power.

Then one faces the problem of expression sin(θ) and cos(θ) as functions of x. Recall that

and that tangent = opposite/adjacent. If the "opposite" side has length x − 4 and the "adjacent" side has length 3, then the Pythagorean theorem tells us that the hypotenuse has length √((x − 4)2 + 32) = √(x2 −8x + 25).

Therefore we have

and

Read more about this topic:  Partial Fractions In Integration

Famous quotes containing the words repeated and/or irreducible:

    “Modern man likes to pretend that his thinking is wide-awake. But this wide-awake thinking has led us into the mazes of a nightmare in which the torture chambers are endlessly repeated in the mirrors of reason.”
    —Octavio Paz (b. 1914)

    “If an irreducible distinction between theatre and cinema does exist, it may be this: Theatre is confined to a logical or continuous use of space. Cinema ... has access to an alogical or discontinuous use of space.”
    —Susan Sontag (b. 1933)