Influence On Traditional Israeli Historical Narrative and Public Opinion
Michal Ben-Josef Hirsch argues that prior to the advent of the New Historians "Israelis held to a one-sided historical narrative of the circumstances leading to the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem, and that any other counter-narratives were taboo." According to Hirsch the research of the New Historians and the wide ranging debate that they provoked broke that taboo and changed the way in which the Palestinian refugee problem and its causes were viewed in Israel. Hirsch states that the traditional Israeli narrative, that Arabs were responsible for the exodus of the Palestinians, held from 1948 to the late 1990's. He states that the arguments of the New Historians significantly challenged that narrative, leading to a broad debate both in academia and in the wider public discourse including journalists and columnists, politicians, public figures, and the general public.
Hirsch sees a significant change in how the Palestinian Refugee issue is viewed in Israeli society from the late 1990's, with a more complex narrative being more prevalent, that accepts instances where Israeli forces expelled Palestinians with the knowledge and authorization of the Israeli leadership. Hirsch attributes that change to research of the New Historians and the debate that their research provoked in Israeli society.
Critics of the New Historians have acknowledged this shift. Avi Beker, writing in the Jerusalem Post, states that the effect of the New Historians work on the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict "cannot be exaggerated". He says the work of the New Historians is now the mainstream in academia, and that their influence was not confined to intellectual circles. To illustrate his point he cites examples from changes to Israeli school text books to the actions of Israeli political leaders and developments in the Peace Process.
Read more about this topic: New Historians
Famous quotes containing the words influence, traditional, israeli, historical, narrative, public and/or opinion:
“Concord River is remarkable for the gentleness of its current, which is scarcely perceptible, and some have referred to its influence the proverbial moderation of the inhabitants of Concord, as exhibited in the Revolution, and on later occasions.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“The traditional novel form continues to enlarge our experience in those very areas where the wide-angle lens and the Cinerama screen tend to narrow it.”
—Daniel J. Boorstin (b. 1914)
“...I want to see a film, they send the Israeli army reserves to escort me! What kind of life is this?”
—Golda Meir (1898–1978)
“Some minds are as little logical or argumentative as nature; they can offer no reason or “guess,” but they exhibit the solemn and incontrovertible fact. If a historical question arises, they cause the tombs to be opened. Their silent and practical logic convinces the reason and the understanding at the same time. Of such sort is always the only pertinent question and the only satisfactory reply.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“The narrative impulse is always with us; we couldn’t imagine ourselves through a day without it.”
—Robert Coover (b. 1932)
“We have to be despised by somebody whom we regard as above us, or we are not happy; we have to have somebody to worship and envy, or we cannot be content. In America we manifest this in all the ancient and customary ways. In public we scoff at titles and hereditary privilege, but privately we hanker after them, and when we get a chance we buy them for cash and a daughter.”
—Mark Twain [Samuel Langhorne Clemens] (1835–1910)
“It takes a very deep-rooted opinion to survive unexpressed.”
—Jean Rostand (1894–1977)