Inner Model

Inner Model

In mathematical logic, suppose T is a theory in the language

of set theory.

If M is a model of describing a set theory and N is a class of M such that

is a model of T containing all ordinals of M then we say that N is an inner model of T (in M). Ordinarily these models are transitive subsets or subclasses of the von Neumann universe V, or sometimes of a generic extension of V

This term inner model is sometimes applied to models which are proper classes; the term set model is used for models which are sets.

A model of set theory is called standard if the element relation of the model is the actual element relation restricted to the model. A model is called transitive when it is standard and the base class is a transitive class of sets. A model of set theory is often assumed to be transitive unless it is explicitly stated that it is non-standard. Inner models are transitive, transitive models are standard, and standard models are well-founded.

The assumption that there exists a standard model of ZFC (in a given universe) is stronger than the assumption that there exists a model. In fact, if there is a standard model, then there is a smallest standard model called the minimal model contained in all standard models. The minimal model contains no standard model (as it is minimal) but (assuming the consistency of ZFC) it contains some model of ZFC by the Godel completeness theorem. This model is necessarily not well founded otherwise its Mostowski collapse would be a standard model. (It is not well founded as a relation in the universe, though it satisfies the axiom of foundation so is "internally" well founded. Being well founded is not an absolute property.) In particular in the minimal model there is a model of ZFC but there is no standard model of ZFC.

Read more about Inner Model:  Use, Related Ideas

Famous quotes containing the word model:

    If the man who paints only the tree, or flower, or other surface he sees before him were an artist, the king of artists would be the photographer. It is for the artist to do something beyond this: in portrait painting to put on canvas something more than the face the model wears for that one day; to paint the man, in short, as well as his features.
    James Mcneill Whistler (1834–1903)