Infinity-Borel Set - Formal Definition

Formal Definition

More formally: we define by simultaneous transfinite recursion the notion of ∞-Borel code, and of the interpretation of such codes. Since is Polish, it has a countable base. Let enumerate that base (that is, is the basic open set). Now:

  • Every natural number is an ∞-Borel code. Its interpretation is .
  • If is an ∞-Borel code with interpretation, then the ordered pair is also an ∞-Borel code, and its interpretation is the complement of, that is, .
  • If is a length-α sequence of ∞-Borel codes for some ordinal α (that is, if for every β<α, is an ∞-Borel code, say with interpretation ), then the ordered pair is an ∞-Borel code, and its interpretation is .

Now a set is ∞-Borel if it is the interpretation of some ∞-Borel code.

The axiom of choice implies that every set can be wellordered, and therefore that every subset of every Polish space is ∞-Borel. Therefore the notion is interesting only in contexts where AC does not hold (or is not known to hold). Unfortunately, without the axiom of choice, it is not clear that the ∞-Borel sets are closed under wellordered union. This is because, given a wellordered union of ∞-Borel sets, each of the individual sets may have many ∞-Borel codes, and there may be no way to choose one code for each of the sets, with which to form the code for the union.

The assumption that every set of reals is ∞-Borel is part of AD+, an extension of the axiom of determinacy studied by Woodin.

Read more about this topic:  Infinity-Borel Set

Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or definition:

    That anger can be expressed through words and non-destructive activities; that promises are intended to be kept; that cleanliness and good eating habits are aspects of self-esteem; that compassion is an attribute to be prized—all these lessons are ones children can learn far more readily through the living example of their parents than they ever can through formal instruction.
    Fred Rogers (20th century)

    Although there is no universal agreement as to a definition of life, its biological manifestations are generally considered to be organization, metabolism, growth, irritability, adaptation, and reproduction.
    The Columbia Encyclopedia, Fifth Edition, the first sentence of the article on “life” (based on wording in the First Edition, 1935)