Gibbs Phenomenon - Formal Mathematical Description of The Phenomenon

Formal Mathematical Description of The Phenomenon

Let be a piecewise continuously differentiable function which is periodic with some period . Suppose that at some point, the left limit and right limit of the function differ by a non-zero gap :

For each positive integer N ≥ 1, let SN f be the Nth partial Fourier series

S_N f(x) := \sum_{-N \leq n \leq N} \hat f(n) e^{2\pi i n x/L} = \frac{1}{2} a_0 + \sum_{n=1}^N \left( a_n \cos\left(\frac{2\pi nx}{L}\right) + b_n \sin\left(\frac{2\pi nx}{L}\right) \right),

where the Fourier coefficients are given by the usual formulae

Then we have

and

but

More generally, if is any sequence of real numbers which converges to as, and if the gap a is positive then

and

If instead the gap a is negative, one needs to interchange limit superior with limit inferior, and also interchange the ≤ and ≥ signs, in the above two inequalities.

Read more about this topic:  Gibbs Phenomenon

Famous quotes containing the words formal, mathematical, description and/or phenomenon:

    “True variety is in that plenitude of real and unexpected elements, in the branch charged with blue flowers thrusting itself, against all expectations, from the springtime hedge which seems already too full, while the purely formal imitation of variety ... is but void and uniformity, that is, that which is most opposed to variety....”
    —Marcel Proust (1871–1922)

    “What is history? Its beginning is that of the centuries of systematic work devoted to the solution of the enigma of death, so that death itself may eventually be overcome. That is why people write symphonies, and why they discover mathematical infinity and electromagnetic waves.”
    —Boris Pasternak (1890–1960)

    “Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
    —Paul Tillich (1886–1965)

    “When the ice is covered with snow, I do not suspect the wealth under my feet; that there is as good as a mine under me wherever I go. How many pickerel are poised on easy fin fathoms below the loaded wain! The revolution of the seasons must be a curious phenomenon to them. At length the sun and wind brush aside their curtain, and they see the heavens again.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)