Definition
The factorial number system is a mixed radix numeral system: the i-th digit from the right has base i, which means that the digit must be strictly less than i, and that (taking into account the bases of the less significant digits) its value to be multiplied by (i − 1)! (its place value).
| Radix | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Place value | 7! | 6! | 5! | 4! | 3! | 2! | 1! | 0! |
| Place value in decimal | 5040 | 720 | 120 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Highest digit allowed | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
From this it follows that the rightmost digit is always 0, the second can be 0 or 1, the third 0, 1 or 2, and so on. The factorial number system is sometimes defined with the 0! place omitted because it is always zero (sequence A007623 in OEIS). Conversely, a further unchanging zero digit may be added in the rightmost position for the 0! place.
In this article, a factorial number representation will be flagged by a subscript "!", so for instance 341010! stands for 364514031201, whose value is ((((3×5 + 4)×4 + 1)×3 + 0)×2 + 1)×1 + 0 = 46310.
General properties of mixed radix number systems also apply to the factorial number system. For instance, one can convert a number into factorial representation producing digits from right to left, by repeatedly dividing the number by the place values (1, 2, 3, ...), taking the remainder as digits, and continuing with the integer quotient, until this quotient becomes 0.
In principle, this system may be extended to represent fractional numbers, though rather than the natural extension of place values (−1)!, (−2)!, etc., which are undefined, the symmetric choice of radix values n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. after the point may be used instead. Again, the 0 and 1 places may be omitted as these are always zero. The corresponding place values are therefore 1/1, 1/1, 1/2, 1/6, 1/24, ..., 1/n!, etc.
Read more about this topic: Factorial Number System
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.””
—Jane Adams (20th century)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)
“... we all know the wag’s definition of a philanthropist: a man whose charity increases directly as the square of the distance.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)