Details
An expanded memory board, being a hardware peripheral, needed a software device driver, which exported its services. Such a device driver was called expanded memory manager. Its name was variable; the previously mentioned boards used REMM.SYS (AST), PS2EMM.SYS (IBM), AEMM.SYS (AT&T) and EMM.SYS (Intel) respectively. Later, the expression became associated with software-only solutions requiring the Intel 80386 processor, for example Quarterdeck's QEMM, Qualitas' 386MAX or the default EMM386 in MS-DOS, PC DOS and DR-DOS.
Expanded memory was a common term for several incompatible technology variants. EEMS, an expanded memory management standard competing with LIM EMS, was developed by AST Research, Quadram and Ashton-Tate. It allowed to also remap some or all of the lower 1024 KiB of memory not associated with interrupts or dedicated I/O memory (such as network or video cards), so that entire programs could be switched in and out of the extra RAM. This feature was used by early DOS multitasker software such as DESQview. The two standards were eventually combined as LIM EMS 4.0.
Expanded Memory usage declined in the 1990s. The IBM AT Intel 80286 supported 24 bits of address space (16 MiB) in protected mode and the 386 supported 32 bit addresses, or 4 gibibytes (GiB) of RAM - roughly four thousand times the addressable space of the original 8086. DOS itself did not directly support protected mode, but Microsoft eventually developed DPMI and several DOS extenders were published based on it. DOS programs like DOOM could use extenders like DOS/4G to run in protected mode while still using the DOS API. In the early 1990s new operating systems like Linux, Microsoft Windows NT, OS/2, and BSD/OS supported protected mode 'out of the box'. These and similar developments rendered Expanded Memory an obsolete concept.
Read more about this topic: Expanded Memory
Famous quotes containing the word details:
“Patience is a most necessary qualification for business; many a man would rather you heard his story than granted his request. One must seem to hear the unreasonable demands of the petulant, unmoved, and the tedious details of the dull, untired. That is the least price that a man must pay for a high station.”
—Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (1694–1773)
“Working women today are trying to achieve in the work world what men have achieved all along—but men have always had the help of a woman at home who took care of all the other details of living! Today the working woman is also that woman at home, and without support services in the workplace and a respect for the work women do within and outside the home, the attempt to do both is taking its toll—on women, on men, and on our children.”
—Jeanne Elium (20th century)
“If my sons are to become the kind of men our daughters would be pleased to live among, attention to domestic details is critical. The hostilities that arise over housework...are crushing the daughters of my generation....Change takes time, but men’s continued obliviousness to home responsibilities is causing women everywhere to expire of trivialities.”
—Mary Kay Blakely (20th century)