Dimension of An Algebraic Variety

Dimension Of An Algebraic Variety

In algebraic geometry, the dimension of an algebraic variety may be defined in various equivalent ways. Some of them are of geometric nature, while some other are purely algebraic and rely on commutative algebra. Some are restricted to algebraic varieties while others apply also to any algebraic set.

Let V be an algebraic set defined as the set of the common zeros of an ideal I in a polynomial ring over a field K, and let A=R/I be the algebra of the polynomials over V. Then the dimension of V is:

  • The maximal length of the chains of distinct nonempty subvarieties.
  • The Krull dimension of A.
  • The maximal Krull dimension of the local rings at the points of V.
  • The maximal dimension of the tangent vector spaces at the non singular points of V.
  • The maximal length of a regular sequence in A.
  • The number of hyperplanes in generic position which are needed to have an intersection with V which is reduced to a finite number of points.
  • The difference between n and the maximal length of the regular sequences contained in I.
  • The degree of the Hilbert polynomial of A.
  • The degree of the denominator of the Hilbert series of A
  • If I is a prime ideal (i.e. V is an algebraic variety), the transcendence degree over K of the field of fractions of A.

If V is a projective variety defined by a homogeneous ideal I, then the values for which A or I appear explicitly in previous definitions must be decreased by one.

Read more about Dimension Of An Algebraic Variety:  Definition By The Transcendence Degree

Famous quotes containing the words dimension of, dimension, algebraic and/or variety:

    “Authority is the spiritual dimension of power because it depends upon faith in a system of meaning that decrees the necessity of the hierarchical order and so provides for the unity of imperative control.”
    —Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)

    “By intervening in the Vietnamese struggle the United States was attempting to fit its global strategies into a world of hillocks and hamlets, to reduce its majestic concerns for the containment of communism and the security of the Free World to a dimension where governments rose and fell as a result of arguments between two colonels’ wives.”
    —Frances Fitzgerald (b. 1940)

    “I have no scheme about it,—no designs on men at all; and, if I had, my mode would be to tempt them with the fruit, and not with the manure. To what end do I lead a simple life at all, pray? That I may teach others to simplify their lives?—and so all our lives be simplified merely, like an algebraic formula? Or not, rather, that I may make use of the ground I have cleared, to live more worthily and profitably?”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “Gradually we come to admit that Shakespeare understands a greater extent and variety of human life than Dante; but that Dante understands deeper degrees of degradation and higher degrees of exaltation.”
    —T.S. (Thomas Stearns)