Definition
A subset C of a vector space V is a convex cone if αx + βy belongs to C, for any positive scalars α, β, and any x, y in C.
The defining condition can be written more succinctly as "αC + βC = C" for any positive scalars α, β.
The concept is meaningful for any vector space that allows the concept of "positive" scalar, such as spaces over the rational, algebraic, or (more commonly) the real numbers.
The empty set, the space V, and any linear subspace of V (including the trivial subspace {0}) are convex cones by this definition. Other examples are the set of all positive multiples of an arbitrary vector v of V, or the positive orthant of (the set of all vectors whose coordinates are all positive).
A more general example is the set of all vectors λx such that λ is a positive scalar and x is an element of some convex subset X of V. In particular, if V is a normed vector space, and X is an open (resp. closed) ball of V that does not contain 0, this construction gives an open (resp. closed) convex circular cone.
The intersection of two convex cones in the same vector space is again a convex cone, but their union may fail to be one. The class of convex cones is also closed under arbitrary linear maps. In particular, if C is a convex cone, so is its opposite -C; and C(-C) is the largest linear subspace contained in C.
Read more about this topic: Convex Cone
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“One definition of man is an intelligence served by organs.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
—William James (18421910)