Congruences of Groups, and Normal Subgroups and Ideals
In the particular case of groups, congruence relations can be described in elementary terms as follows: If G is a group (with identity element e and operation *) and ~ is a binary relation on G, then ~ is a congruence whenever:
- Given any element a of G, a ~ a (reflexivity);
- Given any elements a and b of G, if a ~ b, then b ~ a (symmetry);
- Given any elements a, b, and c of G, if a ~ b and b ~ c, then a ~ c (transitivity);
- Given any elements a, a', b, and b' of G, if a ~ a' and b ~ b', then a * b ~ a' * b' ;
- Given any elements a and a' of G, if a ~ a', then a−1 ~ a' −1 (this can actually be proven from the other four, so is strictly redundant).
Conditions 1, 2, and 3 say that ~ is an equivalence relation.
A congruence ~ is determined entirely by the set {a ∈ G : a ~ e} of those elements of G that are congruent to the identity element, and this set is a normal subgroup. Specifically, a ~ b if and only if b−1 * a ~ e. So instead of talking about congruences on groups, people usually speak in terms of normal subgroups of them; in fact, every congruence corresponds uniquely to some normal subgroup of G.
Read more about this topic: Congruence Relation
Famous quotes containing the words normal and/or ideals:
“You have promise, Mlle. Dubois, but you must choose between an operatic career and what is usually called a normal life. Though why it is so called is beyond me.”
—Eric Taylor, Leroux, and Arthur Lubin. M. Villeneuve (Frank Puglia)
“Our chaotic economic situation has convinced so many of our young people that there is no room for them. They become uncertain and restless and morbid; they grab at false promises, embrace false gods and judge things by treacherous values. Their insecurity makes them believe that tomorrow doesnt matter and the ineffectualness of their lives makes them deny the ideals which we of an older generation acknowledged.”
—Hortense Odlum (1892?)