Congruences of Groups, and Normal Subgroups and Ideals
In the particular case of groups, congruence relations can be described in elementary terms as follows: If G is a group (with identity element e and operation *) and ~ is a binary relation on G, then ~ is a congruence whenever:
- Given any element a of G, a ~ a (reflexivity);
- Given any elements a and b of G, if a ~ b, then b ~ a (symmetry);
- Given any elements a, b, and c of G, if a ~ b and b ~ c, then a ~ c (transitivity);
- Given any elements a, a', b, and b' of G, if a ~ a' and b ~ b', then a * b ~ a' * b' ;
- Given any elements a and a' of G, if a ~ a', then a−1 ~ a' −1 (this can actually be proven from the other four, so is strictly redundant).
Conditions 1, 2, and 3 say that ~ is an equivalence relation.
A congruence ~ is determined entirely by the set {a ∈ G : a ~ e} of those elements of G that are congruent to the identity element, and this set is a normal subgroup. Specifically, a ~ b if and only if b−1 * a ~ e. So instead of talking about congruences on groups, people usually speak in terms of normal subgroups of them; in fact, every congruence corresponds uniquely to some normal subgroup of G.
Read more about this topic: Congruence Relation
Famous quotes containing the words normal and/or ideals:
“The normal present connects the past and the future through limitation. Contiguity results, crystallization by means of solidification. There also exists, however, a spiritual present that identifies past and future through dissolution, and this mixture is the element, the atmosphere of the poet.”
—Novalis [Friedrich Von Hardenberg] (17721801)
“The nineteenth century was completely lacking in logic, it had cosmic terms and hopes, and aspirations, and discoveries, and ideals but it had no logic.”
—Gertrude Stein (18741946)