Central Series

A central series is a sequence of subgroups

such that the successive quotients are central; that is, ≤ Ai, where denotes the commutator subgroup generated by all g−1h−1gh for g in G and h in H. As ≤ AiAi + 1, in particular Ai + 1 is normal in G for each i, and so equivalently we can rephrase the 'central' condition above as: Ai + 1/Ai commutes with all of G/Ai.

A central series is analogous in Lie theory to a flag that is strictly preserved by the adjoint action (more prosaically, a basis in which each element is represented by a strictly upper triangular matrix); compare Engel's theorem.

A group need not have a central series. In fact, a group has a central series if and only if it is a nilpotent group. If a group has a central series, then there are two central series whose terms are extremal in certain senses. Since A1Z(G), the largest choice for A1 is precisely A1 = Z(G). Continuing in this way to choose the largest possible Ai + 1 given Ai produces what is called the upper central series. Dually, since An= G, the commutator subgroup satisfies = ≤ An − 1. Therefore the minimal choice for An − 1 is . Continuing to choose Ai minimally given Ai + 1 such that ≤ Ai produces what is called the lower central series. These series can be constructed for any group, and if a group has a central series (is a nilpotent group), these procedures will yield central series.

Read more about Central Series:  Lower Central Series, Upper Central Series, Connection Between Lower and Upper Central Series, Refined Central Series

Famous quotes containing the words central and/or series:

    But when the self speaks to the self, who is speaking?—the entombed soul, the spirit driven in, in, in to the central catacomb; the self that took the veil and left the world—a coward perhaps, yet somehow beautiful, as it flits with its lantern restlessly up and down the dark corridors.
    Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)

    If the technology cannot shoulder the entire burden of strategic change, it nevertheless can set into motion a series of dynamics that present an important challenge to imperative control and the industrial division of labor. The more blurred the distinction between what workers know and what managers know, the more fragile and pointless any traditional relationships of domination and subordination between them will become.
    Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)