Triangle Scheme For Calculating Bell Numbers
The Bell numbers can easily be calculated by creating the so-called Bell triangle, also called Aitken's array or the Peirce triangle:
- Start with the number one. Put this on a row by itself.
- Start a new row with the rightmost element from the previous row as the leftmost number
- Determine the numbers not on the left column by taking the sum of the number to the left and the number above the number to the left (the number diagonally up and left of the number we are calculating)
- Repeat step three until there is a new row with one more number than the previous row
- The number on the left hand side of a given row is the Bell number for that row.
For example, the first row is made by placing one by itself. The next (second) row is made by taking the rightmost number from the previous row (1), and placing it on a new row. We now have a structure like this:
1 1 ''x''The value x here is determined by adding the number to the left of x (one) and the number above the number to the left of x (also one).
1 1 2 yThe value y is determined by copying over the number from the right of the previous row. Since the number on the right hand side of the previous row has a value of 2, y is given a value of two.
1 1 2 2 3 ''x''Again, since x is not the leftmost element of a given row, its value is determined by taking the sum of the number to x's left (three) and the number above the number to x's left (two). The sum is five.
Here is the first five rows of this triangle:
1 1 2 2 3 5 5 7 10 15 15 20 27 37 52The fifth row is calculated thus:
- Take 15 from the previous row
- 15 + 5 = 20
- 20 + 7 = 27
- 27 + 10 = 37
- 37 + 15 = 52
Read more about this topic: Bell Number
Famous quotes containing the words scheme, calculating, bell and/or numbers:
“Television programming for children need not be saccharine or insipid in order to give to violence its proper balance in the scheme of things.... But as an endless diet for the sake of excitement and sensation in stories whose plots are vehicles for killing and torture and little more, it is not healthy for young children. Unfamiliar as yet with the full story of human response, they are being misled when they are offered perversion before they have fully learned what is sound.”
—Dorothy H. Cohen (20th century)
“I know that the right kind of leader for the Labour Party is a kind of desiccated calculating machine.”
—Aneurin Bevan (18971960)
“... no bell in us tolls to let us know for certain when truth is in our grasp.”
—William James (18421910)
“The barriers of conventionality have been raised so high, and so strangely cemented by long existence, that the only hope of overthrowing them exists in the union of numbers linked together by common opinion and effort ... the united watchword of thousands would strike at the foundation of the false system and annihilate it.”
—Mme. Ellen Louise Demorest 18241898, U.S. womens magazine editor and womans club movement pioneer. Demorests Illustrated Monthly and Mirror of Fashions, p. 203 (January 1870)