Zire Handheld - Comparison

Comparison

Comparison of various Zire devices
Name Zire Zire 21 Z22 Zire 31 Zire 71 Zire 72
Weight 3.8 oz (109 g) 3.4 oz (96 g) 4.1 oz (116 g) 5.3 oz (150 g) 4.8 oz (136 g)
RAM size: total/available/Non-volatile 2/1.8 Mb/No 8/7 Mb/No 32/24.6 Mb/Yes 16/13.8 Mb/No 16/13 Mb/No 32/25 Mb/No
Storage expandable No Yes
Display LCD, b/w, 16 gray levels STN passive matrix, color, 12 bit TFT active matrix, color, 16 bit
Resolution 160*160 320*320
Processor Motorola DragonBall EZ TI OMAP311 Samsung Intel Xscale PXA255 (ARM v.5TE) TI OMAP311 Intel PXA270
Processor frequency 16 MHz 126 MHz 200 MHz 144 MHz 320 MHz
Palm OS version 4.1 5.2.1 Garnet 5.4 5.2.8 5.2.1 5.2.8
PIM version Standard Newer Standard Newer
Audio output None Speaker Headset Jack + Speaker
Multimedia capabilities No MP3 player MP3 player, video player
Additional features and devices No Camera (640*480, 0.3 Megapixel, covered, photo), 5-way joystick Camera (1280*960, 1.2 Megapixel, uncovered, photo and video), microphone and voice recording capability, Bluetooth
Cradle No Yes No

Read more about this topic:  Zire Handheld

Famous quotes containing the word comparison:

    Clay answered the petition by declaring that while he looked on the institution of slavery as an evil, it was ‘nothing in comparison with the far greater evil which would inevitably flow from a sudden and indiscriminate emancipation.’
    State of Indiana, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)

    The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: “his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.”
    Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)

    When we reflect on our past sentiments and affections, our thought is a faithful mirror, and copies its objects truly; but the colours which it employs are faint and dull, in comparison of those in which our original perceptions were clothed.
    David Hume (1711–1776)