Z: Steel Soldiers - Reception

Reception

Reception
Aggregate scores
Aggregator Score
GameRankings 74%
Metacritic 70 out of 100
Review scores
Publication Score
1UP.com D+
Computer and Video Games 7 out of 10
Eurogamer 7 out of 10
GameSpot 6.8 out of 10
GameSpy 88 out of 100
IGN 8 out of 10
PC Zone 9 out of 10
Game Industry News 3.5 out of 5

After it was released the game was given a mostly positive reception by reviewers. The game has an aggregate average of 72% from compilations of multiple reviews. A majority described the game as a fun, strategy game with great graphics. A PC Zone review awarded a Classic Award to Steel Soldiers and concluded that games strong points were the sharp artificial intelligence, good use of ambient sounds and well-designed maps.

A smaller number of reviews were less flattering describing the experience as standard, as one that would bore a veteran RTS gamer. Z: Steel Soldiers is similar to other pc strategy games with a military science fiction theme including Ground Control (2000), StarCraft (1998) and Warzone 2100 (1999). Several reviewers commented that Steel Soldiers offers nothing new to the genre.

Z:Steel Soldiers had a weak impact, compared to the more popular Warcraft II and Command & Conquer. A few reviewers noted tiny annoyances and that the game was predictable while others described the games imperfections as significant. The game has been criticised over its lack of diversity, clumsy interface and generic sounds. One review described the game as old-school, formulaic and lacking distinctive graphics. The humour has been characterized as caustic and witty. At least one reviewer suggested a game-speed toggle would have been a useful addition for players.

Read more about this topic:  Z: Steel Soldiers

Famous quotes containing the word reception:

    To aim to convert a man by miracles is a profanation of the soul. A true conversion, a true Christ, is now, as always, to be made by the reception of beautiful sentiments.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody’s face but their own; which is the chief reason for that kind of reception it meets in the world, and that so very few are offended with it.
    Jonathan Swift (1667–1745)

    I gave a speech in Omaha. After the speech I went to a reception elsewhere in town. A sweet old lady came up to me, put her gloved hand in mine, and said, “I hear you spoke here tonight.” “Oh, it was nothing,” I replied modestly. “Yes,” the little old lady nodded, “that’s what I heard.”
    Gerald R. Ford (b. 1913)