Range of Wing Loadings
| Aircraft | Buzz Z3 | Fun 160 | ASK 21 | Nieuport 17 | Ikarus C42 | Cessna 152 | Vans RV-4 | DC-3 | Spitfire | Messerschmitt Bf-109 | B-17 | B-36 | Eurofighter | F-104 | A380 | B747 | MD-11F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing Loading (kg/m2) |
3.9 | 6.3 | 33 | 38 | 38 | 51 | 67 | 123 | 158 | 173 | 190 | 272 | 311 | 514 | 663 | 740 | 844 |
| Role | paraglider | hang glider | glider | fighter | microlight | trainer | sports | airliner | fighter | fighter | bomber | bomber | fighter | fighter-bomber | airliner | airliner | airliner |
| Year | 2010 | 2007 | 1979 | 1916 | 1997 | 1978 | 1980 | 1936 | 1942 | 1941 | 1938 | 1949 | 1998 | 1958 | 2007 | 1970 | 1990 |
The table, which shows wing loadings, is intended to give an idea of the range of wing loadings used by aircraft. Maximum weights have been used. There will be variations amongst variants of any particular type. The dates are approximate, indicating period of introduction.
The critical limit for bird flight is about 5 lb/ft2 (25 kg/m2). An analysis of bird flight which looked at 138 species ranging in mass from 10 g to 10 kg, from small passerines to swans and cranes found wing loadings from about 1 to 20 kg/m2. The wing loadings of some of the lightest aircraft fall comfortably within this range. One typical hang-glider (see table) has a maximum wing loading of 6.3 kg/m2, and an ultralight rigid glider 8.3 kg/m2.
Read more about this topic: Wing Loading
Famous quotes containing the words range of, range and/or wing:
“We must continually remind students in the classroom that expression of different opinions and dissenting ideas affirms the intellectual process. We should forcefully explain that our role is not to teach them to think as we do but rather to teach them, by example, the importance of taking a stance that is rooted in rigorous engagement with the full range of ideas about a topic.”
—bell hooks (b. 1955)
“The variables of quantification, ‘something,’ ‘nothing,’ ‘everything,’ range over our whole ontology, whatever it may be; and we are convicted of a particular ontological presupposition if, and only if, the alleged presuppositum has to be reckoned among the entities over which our variables range in order to render one of our affirmations true.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)
“Fan the sinking flame of hilarity with the wing of friendship; and pass the rosy wine.”
—Charles Dickens (1812–1870)