Whitehead Theorem - Spaces With Isomorphic Homotopy Groups May Not Be Homotopy Equivalent

Spaces With Isomorphic Homotopy Groups May Not Be Homotopy Equivalent

A word of caution: it is not enough to assume πn(X) is isomorphic to πn(Y) for each n ≥ 1 in order to conclude that X and Y are homotopy equivalent. One really needs a map f : XY inducing such isomorphisms in homotopy. For instance, take X= S2 × RP3 and Y= RP² × S³. Then X and Y have the same fundamental group, namely Z2, and the same universal cover, namely S² × S³; thus, they have isomorphic homotopy groups. On the other hand their homology groups are different (as can be seen from the Künneth formula); thus, X and Y are not homotopy equivalent.

The Whitehead theorem does not hold for general topological spaces or even for all subspaces of Rn. For example, the Warsaw circle, a subset of the plane, has all homotopy groups zero, but the map from the Warsaw circle to a single point is not a homotopy equivalence. The study of possible generalizations of Whitehead's theorem to more general spaces is part of the subject of shape theory.

Read more about this topic:  Whitehead Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words spaces, groups and/or equivalent:

    Le silence éternel de ces espaces infinis m’effraie. The eternal silence of these infinite spaces frightens me.
    Blaise Pascal (1623–1662)

    As in political revolutions, so in paradigm choice—there is no standard higher than the assent of the relevant community. To discover how scientific revolutions are effected, we shall therefore have to examine not only the impact of nature and of logic, but also the techniques of persuasive argumentation effective within the quite special groups that constitute the community of scientists.
    Thomas S. Kuhn (b. 1922)

    For some men the power to destroy life becomes the equivalent to the female power to create life.
    Myriam Miedzian, U.S. author. Boys Will Be Boys, ch. 4 (1991)