Gaussian Wavepackets in Quantum Mechanics
The above Gaussian wavepacket, unnormalized and just centered at the origin, instead, can now be written in 3D:
where a is a positive real number, the square of the width of the wavepacket, a = 2⟨r·r⟩/3⟨1⟩ = 2 (Δx)2.
The Fourier transform is also a Gaussian in terms of the wavenumber, the k-vector, (with inverse width, 1/a = 2⟨k·k⟩/3⟨1⟩ = 2 (Δpx/ħ)2, so that Δx Δpx=ħ/2, i.e. it saturates the uncertainty relation),
Each separate wave only phase-rotates in time, so that the time dependent Fourier-transformed solution is:
The inverse Fourier transform is still a Gaussian, but the parameter a has become complex, and there is an overall normalization factor.
The integral of Ψ over all space is invariant, because it is the inner product of Ψ with the state of zero energy, which is a wave with infinite wavelength, a constant function of space. For any energy eigenstate η(x), the inner product:
- ,
only changes in time in a simple way: its phase rotates with a frequency determined by the energy of η. When η has zero energy, like the infinite wavelength wave, it doesn't change at all. The integral ∫|Ψ|2d3r is also invariant, which is a statement of the conservation of probability. Explicitly,
The width of the Gaussian is the interesting quantity which can be read off from |Ψ|2:
- .
The width eventually grows linearly in time, as ħt /m√a, indicating wave-packet spreading.
This linear growth is a reflection of the momentum uncertainty: the wavepacket is confined to a narrow width √a, and so has a momentum which is uncertain (according to the uncertainty principle) by the amount ħ/2√a, a spread in velocity of ħ/2m√a, and thus in the future position by ħt /m√a. (The uncertainty relation is then a strict inequality, far from saturation.)
Read more about this topic: Wave Packet
Famous quotes containing the words quantum and/or mechanics:
“But how is one to make a scientist understand that there is something unalterably deranged about differential calculus, quantum theory, or the obscene and so inanely liturgical ordeals of the precession of the equinoxes.”
—Antonin Artaud (18961948)
“the moderate Aristotelian city
Of darning and the Eight-Fifteen, where Euclids geometry
And Newtons mechanics would account for our experience,
And the kitchen table exists because I scrub it.”
—W.H. (Wystan Hugh)