Measurable Sets
Certain sets have a definite 'length' or 'mass'. For instance, the interval is deemed to have length 1; more generally, an interval, a ≤ b, is deemed to have length b−a. If we think of such intervals as metal rods with uniform density, they likewise have well-defined masses. The set ∪ is composed of two intervals of length one, so we take its total length to be 2. In terms of mass, we have two rods of mass 1, so the total mass is 2.
There is a natural question here: if E is an arbitrary subset of the real line, does it have a 'mass' or 'total length'? As an example, we might ask what is the mass of the set of rational numbers, given that the mass of the interval is 1. The rationals are dense in the reals, so any non negative value may appear reasonable.
However the closest generalization to mass is sigma additivity, which gives rise to the Lebesgue measure. It assigns a measure of b − a to the interval, but will assign a measure of 0 to the set of rational numbers because it is countable. Any set which has a well-defined Lebesgue measure is said to be "measurable", but the construction of the Lebesgue measure (for instance using Carathéodory's extension theorem) does not make it obvious whether there exist non-measurable sets. The answer to that question involves the axiom of choice.
Read more about this topic: Vitali Set
Famous quotes containing the word sets:
“In my dealing with my child, my Latin and Greek, my accomplishments and my money stead me nothing; but as much soul as I have avails. If I am wilful, he sets his will against mine, one for one, and leaves me, if I please, the degradation of beating him by my superiority of strength. But if I renounce my will, and act for the soul, setting that up as umpire between us two, out of his young eyes looks the same soul; he reveres and loves with me.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)