Vitali Set - Construction and Proof

Construction and Proof

The rational numbers Q form a subgroup of the real numbers R under addition. The additive quotient group R/Q (the group formed by the cosets of the rational numbers as a subgroup of the real numbers under addition) consists of disjoint "shifted copies" of the rational numbers in the sense that each element of this quotient group is a set of the form Q + r for some r in R.

The elements of the quotient group R/Q partition R. There are uncountably many elements, and each element is dense in R. Each element of R/Q intersects, and the axiom of choice guarantees the existence of a subset of containing exactly one representative out of each element of R/Q. A set formed this way is called a Vitali set, i.e., a Vitali set V is a subset of which, for each real number rR, contains exactly one number v such that vr is rational. Every Vitali set V is uncountable, and vu is irrational for any .

A Vitali set is non-measurable. To show this, we assume that V is measurable and we derive a contradiction. Let q1, q2, ... be an enumeration of the rational numbers in (recall that the rational numbers are countable). From the construction of V, note that the translated sets, k = 1, 2, ... are pairwise disjoint, and further note that . (To see the first inclusion, consider any real number r in and let v be the representative in V for the equivalence class ; then rv = q for some rational number q in .)

Apply the Lebesgue measure to these inclusions using sigma additivity:

Because the Lebesgue measure is translation invariant, and therefore

But this is impossible. Summing infinitely many copies of the constant λ(V) yields either zero or infinity, according to whether the constant is zero or positive. In neither case is the sum in . So V cannot have been measurable after all, i.e., the Lebesgue measure λ must not define any value for λ(V).

Read more about this topic:  Vitali Set

Famous quotes containing the words construction and/or proof:

    There’s no art
    To find the mind’s construction in the face:
    He was a gentleman on whom I built
    An absolute trust.
    William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

    The source of Pyrrhonism comes from failing to distinguish between a demonstration, a proof and a probability. A demonstration supposes that the contradictory idea is impossible; a proof of fact is where all the reasons lead to belief, without there being any pretext for doubt; a probability is where the reasons for belief are stronger than those for doubting.
    Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743)