Vic Toews - Electoral Record

Electoral Record

Canadian federal election, 2011
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Conservative Vic Toews 27,705 70.6% +5.9% --
New Democratic Al Mackling 7,043 17.9% +4.2% --
Liberal Terry Hayward 2,636 6.7% -5.9% --
Green Janine Gibson 1,163 3.0% -2.8% --
Christian Heritage David Reimer 506 1.3% -1.9 --
Canadian federal election, 2008
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Conservative Vic Toews 23,303 64.7% -1.0% $67,419
New Democratic Ross Martin 4,947 13.7% 0.0% $6,406
Liberal Shirley Hiebert 4,531 12.6% -3.3% $16,369
Green Janine Gibson 2,089 5.8% +1.0% $1,093
Christian Heritage David Reimer 1,170 3.2% – $10,130
Total valid votes/Expense limit 36,040 100.0% $87,213


Canadian federal election, 2006: Provencher
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Conservative (x)Vic Toews 25,199 65.68 +2.66 $40,862.19
Liberal Wes Penner 6,077 15.84 -9.08 $75,239.46
New Democratic Party Patrick O'Connor 5,259 13.71 +4.70 $2,266.71
Green Janine Gibson 1,830 4.77 +1.72 $87.31
Total valid votes 38,365 100.00
Total rejected ballots 157 0.41 -0.02
Turnout 38,522 65.05 +5.38
Electors on the lists 59,216


Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.


Canadian federal election, 2004: Provencher
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Conservative (x)Vic Toews 22,694 63.02 +4.99 $70,851.00
Liberal Peter Epp 8,975 24.92 -10.94 $64,895.23
New Democratic Party Sarah Zaharia 3,244 9.01 +2.90 $1,472.79
Green Janine Gibson 1,100 3.05 $480.59
Total valid votes 36,013 100.00
Total rejected ballots 155 0.43 +0.07
Turnout 36,168 59.67 -10.36
Electors on the lists 60,617


Percentage change figures are factored for redistribution. Conservative Party percentages are contrasted with the combined Canadian Alliance and Progressive Conservative percentages from 2000.
Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.


Canadian federal election, 2000: Provencher
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Canadian Alliance Vic Toews 21,358 52.76 +17.68 $65,896.75
Liberal (x)David Iftody 14,419 35.62 -4.38 $60,917.43
Progressive Conservative Henry C. Dyck 2,726 6.73 -9.59 $7,780.05
New Democratic Party Peter Hiebert 1,980 4.89 -3.71 $210.45
Total valid votes 40,483 100.00
Total rejected ballots 148 0.36 -0.10
Turnout 40,631 70.03 +5.09
Electors on the lists 58,020


Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.


Manitoba general election, 1999: Rossmere
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
New Democratic Party Harry Schellenberg 5,097 49.21 $25,409.00
Progressive Conservative (x)Vic Toews 4,803 46.37 $30,765.70
Liberal Cecilia Connelly 396 3.82 $766.92
Libertarian Chris Buors 62 0.60 $353.40
Total valid votes 10,358 100.00
Rejected and discarded votes 54
Turnout 10,412 79.47
Registered voters 13,102

Note: A subsequent investigation by Elections Manitoba found that Toews overspent by $7,500
in the 1999 campaign.


Manitoba general election, 1995: Rossmere
Party Candidate Votes % Expenditures
Progressive Conservative Vic Toews 4,318 45.97 $20,855.00
New Democratic Party (x)Harry Schellenberg 4,201 44.72 $22,807.00
Liberal Cecilia Connelly 875 9.31 $6,262.74
Total valid votes 9,394 100.00
Rejected and discarded votes 37
Turnout 9,431 77.08
Registered voters 12,235


Manitoba general election, 1990: Elmwood
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp
New Democratic Party (x)Jim Maloway 4,127 46.98
Progressive Conservative Vic Toews 3,035 34.55
Liberal Ed Price 1,623 18.47
Total valid votes 8,785 100.00
Rejected ballots 35
Turnout 8,820 71.63
Registered voters 12,313

All electoral information is taken from Elections Canada and Elections Manitoba. Provincial election expenditures refer to individual candidate expenses. Italicized expenditures refer to submitted totals, and are presented when the final reviewed totals are not available.

Read more about this topic:  Vic Toews

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or record:

    “Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.”
    —Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)

    “Unlike Boswell, whose Journals record a long and unrewarded search for a self, Johnson possessed a formidable one. His life in London—he arrived twenty-five years earlier than Boswell—turned out to be a long defense of the values of Augustan humanism against the pressures of other possibilities. In contrast to Boswell, Johnson possesses an identity not because he has gone in search of one, but because of his allegiance to a set of assumptions that he regards as objectively true.”
    —Jeffrey Hart (b. 1930)