Formal Definition
Let M be a smooth manifold and E → M be a smooth vector bundle over M. We denote the space of smooth sections of a bundle E by Γ(E). A E-valued differential form of degree p is a smooth section of the tensor product bundle of E with Λp(T*M), the p-th exterior power of the cotangent bundle of M. The space of such forms is denoted by
Because Γ is a monoidal functor, this can also be interpreted as
where the latter two tensor products are the tensor product of modules over the ring Ω0(M) of smooth R-valued functions on M (see the fifth example here). By convention, an E-valued 0-form is just a section of the bundle E. That is,
Equivalently, a E-valued differential form can be defined as a bundle morphism
which is totally skew-symmetric.
Let V be a fixed vector space. A V-valued differential form of degree p is a differential form of degree p with values in the trivial bundle M × V. The space of such forms is denoted Ωp(M, V). When V = R one recovers the definition of an ordinary differential form. If V is finite-dimensional, then one can show that the natural homomorphism
where the first tensor product is of vector spaces over R, is an isomorphism. One can verify this for p=0 by turning a basis for V into a set of constant functions to V, which allows the construction of an inverse to the above homomorphism. The general case can be proved by noting that
and that because is a sub-ring of Ω0(M) via the constant functions,
Read more about this topic: Vector-valued Differential Form
Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or definition:
“Then the justice,
In fair round belly with good capon lined,
With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,
Full of wise saws and modern instances;
And so he plays his part.”
—William Shakespeare (15641616)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (18391894)