Use Value - How Marx Defines Use Value

How Marx Defines Use Value

Part of a series on
Marxian economics
Concepts
  • Capital (economics)
  • Capital accumulation
  • Capitalist mode of production
  • Class process
  • Commodity (Marxism)
  • Commodity production
  • Concrete and Abstract Labor
  • Constant capital
  • Exchange value
  • Exploitation
  • Labour power
  • Labour theory of value
  • Law of accumulation
  • Law of value
  • Means of production
  • Mode of production
  • Monopoly capitalism
  • Organic composition of capital
  • Productive forces
  • Profit (economics)
  • Prices of production
  • Primitive accumulation
  • Rate of profit
  • Relations of production
  • Reproduction (economics)
  • Reserve army of labour
  • Socially necessary labour time
  • Socialist mode of production
  • Socialization (economics)
  • Simple commodity production
  • Surplus value
  • Surplus labour
  • Surplus product
  • Use value
  • Wage labour
  • Value-form
  • Value product
  • Variable capital
Topics
  • Capital controversy
  • Crisis theory
  • Economic determinism
  • Historical materialism
  • Lucas paradox
  • Okishio's theorem
  • Overaccumulation
  • Overdetermination
  • Overproduction
  • Kondratiev wave
  • Technological determinism
  • Temporal single-system interpretation
  • Tendency of the rate of profit to fall
  • Transformation problem
  • Underconsumption
  • Value (economics)
Variants
  • Analytical Marxism
  • Classical Marxism
  • Orthodox Marxism
  • Overaccumulation school
  • Neo-Marxian economics
  • Underconsumptionist school
Works A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
Das Kapital
Grundrisse
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
The Accumulation of Capital
Monopoly Capital
Theory of capitalist development
Finance Capital
People
  • Karl Marx
  • Friedrich Engels
  • Rudolf Hilferding
  • Leon Trotsky
  • Karl Kautsky
  • Ernest Mandel
  • Rosa Luxemburg
  • Antonie Pannekoek
  • János Kornai
  • Andrew Kliman
  • Richard D. Wolff
  • Nikolai Kondratiev
  • Paul Sweezy
  • Nobuo Okishio
  • Ian Steedman
  • John Roemer
  • David Laibman
  • Branko Horvat
  • Paul A. Baran
  • Piero Sraffa
  • Stephen Resnick
  • Robert Emerson Lucas, Jr
  • Michał Kalecki
Journals
  • Cambridge Journal of Economics
  • International Journal of Political Economy
  • Monthly Review
  • New School Economic Review
  • Real-world economics review
  • Rethinking Marxism
  • Science and Society
Economics portal

Marx first defines use-value precisely in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859) where he explains that:

"To begin with, a commodity, in the language of the English economists, is 'any thing necessary, useful or pleasant in life,' an object of human wants, a means of existence in the widest sense of the term. Use-value as an aspect of the commodity coincides with the physical palpable existence of the commodity. Wheat, for example, is a distinct use-value differing from the use-values of cotton, glass, paper, etc. A use-value has value only in use, and is realized only in the process of consumption. One and the same use-value can be used in various ways. But the extent of its possible application is limited by its existence as an object with distinct properties. It is, moreover, determined not only qualitatively but also quantitatively. Different use-values have different measures appropriate to their physical characteristics; for example, a bushel of wheat, a quire of paper, a yard of linen. Whatever its social form may be, wealth always consists of use-values, which in the first instance are not affected by this form. From the taste of wheat it is not possible to tell who produced it, a Russian serf, a French peasant or an English capitalist. Although use-values serve social needs and therefore exist within the social framework, they do not express the social relations of production. For instance, let us take as a use-value a commodity such as a diamond. We cannot tell by looking at it that the diamond is a commodity. Where it serves as an aesthetic or mechanical use-value, on the neck of a courtesan or in the hand of a glass-cutter, it is a diamond and not a commodity. To be a use-value is evidently a necessary prerequisite of the commodity, but it is immaterial to the use-value whether it is a commodity. Use-value as such, since it is independent of the determinate economic form, lies outside the sphere of investigation of political economy. It belongs in this sphere only when it is itself a determinate form. Use-value is the immediate physical entity in which a definite economic relationship – exchange-value – is expressed."

The concept is also introduced at the beginning of Das Kapital, where Marx writes:

"The utility of a thing makes it a use value. But this utility is not a thing of air. Being limited by the physical properties of the commodity, it has no existence apart from that commodity. A commodity, such as iron, corn, or a diamond, is therefore, so far as it is a material thing, a use value, something useful. This property of a commodity is independent of the amount of labour required to appropriate its useful qualities. When treating of use value, we always assume to be dealing with definite quantities, such as dozens of watches, yards of linen, or tons of iron. The use values of commodities furnish the material for a special study, that of the commercial knowledge of commodities. Use values become a reality only by use or consumption: they also constitute the substance of all wealth, whatever may be the social form of that wealth. In the form of society we are about to consider, they are, in addition, the material depositories of exchange value."

This was a direct reference by Marx to Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right §63. Marx adds that:

"A thing can be a use value, without having value. This is the case whenever its utility to man is not due to labour. Such are air, virgin soil, natural meadows, &c. A thing can be useful, and the product of human labour, without being a commodity. Whoever directly satisfies his wants with the produce of his own labour, creates, indeed, use values, but not commodities. In order to produce the latter, he must not only produce use values, but use values for others, social use values. (And not only for others, without more. The mediaeval peasant produced quit-rent-corn for his feudal lord and tithe-corn for his parson. But neither the quit-rent-corn nor the tithe-corn became commodities by reason of the fact that they had been produced for others. To become a commodity a product must be transferred to another, whom it will serve as a use value, by means of an exchange.) Lastly nothing can have value, without being an object of utility. If the thing is useless, so is the labour contained in it; the labour does not count as labour, and therefore creates no value." (Capital Vol. I, end of Section 1, Chapter 1)

Marx acknowledges that a nominal price or value can be imputed to goods or assets which are not reproducible goods and not produced by human labour.

Read more about this topic:  Use Value

Famous quotes containing the words marx and/or defines:

    The animal is one with its life activity. It does not distinguish the activity from itself. It is its activity. But man makes his life activity itself an object of his will and consciousness. He has a conscious life activity. It is not a determination with which he is completely identified.
    —Karl Marx (1818–1883)

    To exist is equivalent to an act of faith, a protest against the truth, an interminable prayer.... As soon as they consent to live, the unbeliever and the man of faith are fundamentally the same, since both have made the only decision that defines a being.
    E.M. Cioran (b. 1911)