Difference Between Union and Structure
A union is a class all of whose data members are mapped to the same address within its object. The size of an object of a union is, therefore, the size of its largest data member.
In a structure, all of its data members are stored in contiguous memory locations. The size of an object of a struct is, therefore, the size of the sum of all its data members.
This gain in space efficiency, while valuable in certain circumstances, comes at a great cost of safety: the program logic must ensure that it only reads the field most recently written along all possible execution paths. The exception is when unions are used for type conversion: in this case, a certain field is written and the subsequently read field is deliberately different.
An example illustrating this point is:
+-----+-----+ struct { int a; float b } gives | a | b | +-----+-----+ ^ ^ | | memory location: 150 154 | V +-----+ union { int a; float b } gives | a | | b | +-----+Structures are used where an "object" is composed of other objects, like a point object consisting of two integers, those being the x and y coordinates:
typedef struct { int x; // x and y are separate int y; } tPoint;Unions are typically used in situation where an object can be one of many things but only one at a time, such as a type-less storage system:
typedef enum { STR, INT } tType; typedef struct { tType typ; // typ is separate. union { int ival; // ival and sval occupy same memory. char *sval; } } tVal;Read more about this topic: Union (computer Science)
Famous quotes containing the words difference between, difference, union and/or structure:
“The most dangerous aspect of present-day life is the dissolution of the feeling of individual responsibility. Mass solitude has done away with any difference between the internal and the external, between the intellectual and the physical.”
—Eugenio Montale (1896–1981)
“There is all the difference in the world between the criminal’s avoiding the public eye and the civil disobedient’s taking the law into his own hands in open defiance. This distinction between an open violation of the law, performed in public, and a clandestine one is so glaringly obvious that it can be neglected only by prejudice or ill will.”
—Hannah Arendt (1906–1975)
“To emancipate [the slaves] entirely throughout the Union cannot, I conceive, be thought of, consistently with the safety of the country.”
—Frances Trollope (1780–1863)
“... the structure of our public morality crashed to earth. Above its grave a tombstone read, “Be tolerant—even of evil.” Logically the next step would be to say to our commonwealth’s criminals, “I disagree that it’s all right to rob and murder, but naturally I respect your opinion.” Tolerance is only complacence when it makes no distinction between right and wrong.”
—Sarah Patton Boyle, U.S. civil rights activist and author. The Desegregated Heart, part 2, ch. 2 (1962)