Triangular Matrix - Description

Description

A matrix of the form

 L=
\begin{bmatrix}
l_{1,1} & & & & 0 \\
l_{2,1} & l_{2,2} & & & \\
l_{3,1} & l_{3,2} & \ddots & & \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & \\
l_{n,1} & l_{n,2} & \ldots & l_{n,n-1} & l_{n,n}
\end{bmatrix}

is called a lower triangular matrix or left triangular matrix, and analogously a matrix of the form

 U =
\begin{bmatrix}
u_{1,1} & u_{1,2} & u_{1,3} & \ldots & u_{1,n} \\ & u_{2,2} & u_{2,3} & \ldots & u_{2,n} \\ & & \ddots & \ddots & \vdots \\ & & & \ddots & u_{n-1,n}\\ 0 & & & & u_{n,n}
\end{bmatrix}

is called an upper triangular matrix or right triangular matrix. The variable L (standing for lower or left) is commonly used to represent a lower triangular matrix, while the variable U (standing for upper) or R (standing for right) is commonly used for upper triangular matrix. A matrix that is both upper and lower triangular is diagonal.

Matrices that are similar to triangular matrices are called triangularisable.

The standard operations on triangular matrices preserve the triangular shape:

  • The sum of two upper triangular matrices is upper triangular.
  • The product of two upper triangular matrices is upper triangular.
  • The inverse of an invertible upper triangular matrix is upper triangular.
  • The product of an upper triangular matrix by a constant is an upper triangular matrix.

Together these facts mean that the upper triangular matrices form a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of square matrices for any given size. The Lie algebra of all upper triangular matrices is often referred to as the Borel subalgebra, denoted . The analogous results hold for lower triangular matrices, so they also form a Lie subalgebra. However, note that the product of a lower triangular with an upper triangular matrix is not necessarily triangular.

Read more about this topic:  Triangular Matrix

Famous quotes containing the word description:

    I was here first introduced to Joe.... He was a good-looking Indian, twenty-four years old, apparently of unmixed blood, short and stout, with a broad face and reddish complexion, and eyes, methinks, narrower and more turned up at the outer corners than ours, answering to the description of his race. Besides his underclothing, he wore a red flannel shirt, woolen pants, and a black Kossuth hat, the ordinary dress of the lumberman, and, to a considerable extent, of the Penobscot Indian.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Whose are the truly labored sentences? From the weak and flimsy periods of the politician and literary man, we are glad to turn even to the description of work, the simple record of the month’s labor in the farmer’s almanac, to restore our tone and spirits.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.
    Paul Tillich (1886–1965)