Comparison of OSI Transport Protocols
The OSI model defines five classes of connection-mode transport protocols designated class 0 (TP0) to class 4 (TP4). Class 0 contains no error recovery, and was designed for use on network layers that provide error-free connections. Class 4 is closest to TCP, although TCP contains functions, such as the graceful close, which OSI assigns to the session layer. All OSI connection-mode protocol classes provide expedited data and preservation of record boundaries. Detailed characteristics of the classes are shown in the following table:
| Service | TP0 | TP1 | TP2 | TP3 | TP4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connection oriented network | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connectionless network | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Concatenation and separation | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Segmentation and reassembly | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Error Recovery | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reinitiate connection (if an excessive number of PDUs are unacknowledged) | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| multiplexing and demultiplexing over a single virtual circuit | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Explicit flow control | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Retransmission on timeout | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Reliable Transport Service | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Read more about this topic: Transport Layer
Famous quotes containing the words comparison and/or transport:
“Most parents aren’t even aware of how often they compare their children. . . . Comparisons carry the suggestion that specific conditions exist for parental love and acceptance. Thus, even when one child comes out on top in a comparison she is left feeling uneasy about the tenuousness of her position and the possibility of faring less well in the next comparison.”
—Marianne E. Neifert (20th century)
“One may disavow and disclaim vices that surprise us, and whereto our passions transport us; but those which by long habits are rooted in a strong and ... powerful will are not subject to contradiction. Repentance is but a denying of our will, and an opposition of our fantasies.”
—Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)