The Canons of Dort
Part of a series on |
Arminianism |
Jacobus Arminius
|
Background |
- Protestantism
- Reformation
- Five Articles of Remonstrance
- Calvinist–Arminian debate
- Armianism in the Anglican Church
|
People |
- Jacobus Arminius
- Simon Episcopius
- Hugo Grotius
- The Remonstrants
- Synod of Dort participants
- John Wesley
|
Doctrine |
- Total depravity
- Conditional election
- Unlimited atonement
- Prevenient grace
- Conditional preservation
|
Arminianism portal |
|
Calvinism |
|
John Calvin |
Background |
- Christianity
- St. Augustine
- The Reformation
- Five Solas
- Synod of Dort
|
|
Theology |
- Five Points (TULIP)
- Covenant theology
- Regulative principle
|
|
Documents |
- Calvin's Institutes
- Geneva Bible
- Three Forms of Unity
- Westminster Standards
|
|
Influences |
- Huldrych Zwingli
- Martin Bucer
- Peter Martyr Vermigli
- Heinrich Bullinger
- John Calvin
- John Knox
- Theodore Beza
- Francis Turretin
- Jonathan Edwards
- Charles Hodge
|
|
Churches |
- Continental Reformed
- Presbyterian
- Congregationalist
- Reformed Baptist
- Low church Anglican
|
|
Peoples |
- Afrikaners
- Huguenots
- Pilgrims
- Puritans
- Scots
|
|
Calvinism portal |
|
The Synod concluded with a rejection of the Arminian views, and set forth the Reformed doctrine on each point, namely: total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement (arguing the efficacy of Christ's atoning work was applicable only to the elect and not the unregenerate world), irresistible (or irrevocable) grace, and the perseverance of the saints. These are sometimes referred to as the Five points of Calvinism. The Decision of the Synod of Dort on the Five Main Points of Doctrine in Dispute in the Netherlands, popularly known as the Canons of Dort, is the explanation of the judicial decision of the Synod. In the original preface, the Decision is called:
a judgment, in which both, the true view agreeing with God's word concerning the aforesaid five points of doctrine is explained and, the false view disagreeing with God's Word is rejected.