Solid Angle - Solid Angles in Arbitrary Dimensions

Solid Angles in Arbitrary Dimensions

The solid angle subtended by the full surface of the unit n-sphere (in the geometer's sense) can be defined in any number of dimensions . One often needs this solid angle factor in calculations with spherical symmetry. It is given by the formula

\Omega_{d} = \frac{2\pi^{d/2}}{\Gamma(\frac{d}{2})}

where is the Gamma function. When is an integer, the Gamma function can be computed explicitly. It follows that

\Omega_{d} = \begin{cases} \frac{2\pi^{d/2}}{ \left (\frac{d}{2}-1 \right )!} & d\text{ even} \\ \frac{2^d\left (\frac{d-1}{2} \right )!}{(d-1)!} \pi^{(d-1)/2} & d\text{ odd} \end{cases}

This gives the expected results of 2π rad for the 2D circumference and 4π sr for the 3D sphere. It also throws the slightly less obvious 2 for the 1D case, in which the origin-centered unit "sphere" is the set, which indeed has a measure of 2.

Read more about this topic:  Solid Angle

Famous quotes containing the words solid, arbitrary and/or dimensions:

    “He could walk, or rather turn about in his little garden, and feel more solid happiness from the flourishing of a cabbage or the growing of a turnip than was ever received from the most ostentatious show the vanity of man could possibly invent. He could delight himself with thinking, “Here will I set such a root, because my Camilla likes it; here, such another, because it is my little David’s favorite.””
    —Sarah Fielding (1710–1768)

    “We do the same thing to parents that we do to children. We insist that they are some kind of categorical abstraction because they produced a child. They were people before that, and they’re still people in all other areas of their lives. But when it comes to the state of parenthood they are abruptly heir to a whole collection of virtues and feelings that are assigned to them with a fine arbitrary disregard for individuality.”
    —Leontine Young (20th century)

    “I was surprised by Joe’s asking me how far it was to the Moosehorn. He was pretty well acquainted with this stream, but he had noticed that I was curious about distances, and had several maps. He and Indians generally, with whom I have talked, are not able to describe dimensions or distances in our measures with any accuracy. He could tell, perhaps, at what time we should arrive, but not how far it was.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)