Axiomatic Set Theory
Although initially naive set theory, which defines a set merely as any well-defined collection, was well accepted, it soon ran into several obstacles. It was found that this definition spawned several paradoxes, most notably:
- Russell's paradox—It shows that the "set of all sets which do not contain themselves," i.e. the "set" { x : x is a set and x ∉ x } does not exist.
- Cantor's paradox—It shows that "the set of all sets" cannot exist.
The reason is that the phrase well-defined is not very well defined. It was important to free set theory of these paradoxes because nearly all of mathematics was being redefined in terms of set theory. In an attempt to avoid these paradoxes, set theory was axiomatized based on first-order logic, and thus axiomatic set theory was born.
For most purposes however, naive set theory is still useful.
Read more about this topic: Set (mathematics)
Famous quotes containing the words axiomatic, set and/or theory:
“It is ... axiomatic that we should all think of ourselves as being more sensitive than other people because, when we are insensitive in our dealings with others, we cannot be aware of it at the time: conscious insensitivity is a self-contradiction.”
—W.H. (Wystan Hugh)
“And the sentinel stars set their watch in the sky;”
—Thomas Campbell (1774–1844)
“... the first reason for psychology’s failure to understand what people are and how they act, is that clinicians and psychiatrists, who are generally the theoreticians on these matters, have essentially made up myths without any evidence to support them; the second reason for psychology’s failure is that personality theory has looked for inner traits when it should have been looking for social context.”
—Naomi Weisstein (b. 1939)