Semidirect Products and Group Homomorphisms
Let G be a semidirect product of the normal subgroup N and the subgroup H. Let Aut(N) denote the group of all automorphisms of N. The map φ : H → Aut(N) defined by φ(h) = φh, where φh(n) = hnh−1 for all h in H and n in N, is a group homomorphism. Together N, H and φ determine G up to isomorphism, as we show now.
Given any two groups N and H (not necessarily subgroups of a given group) and a group homomorphism : H → Aut(N), there is a new group (or simply ), called the semidirect product of N and H with respect to , defined as follows.
- As a set, is the cartesian product N × H.
- Multiplication of elements in is determined by the homomorphism . The operation is
-
- defined by
- for n1, n2 in N and h1, h2 in H.
This defines a group in which the identity element is (eN, eH) and the inverse of the element (n, h) is (h–1(n–1), h–1). Pairs (n,eH) form a normal subgroup isomorphic to N, while pairs (eN, h) form a subgroup isomorphic to H. The full group is a semidirect product of those two subgroups in the sense given above.
Conversely, suppose that we are given a group G with a normal subgroup N and a subgroup H, such that every element g of G may be written uniquely in the form g=nh where n lies in N and h lies in H. Let : H → Aut(N) be the homomorphism given by (h) = h, where
for all n in N and h in H. Then G is isomorphic to the semidirect product ; the isomorphism sends the product nh to the tuple (n,h). In G, we have the multiplication rule
A version of the splitting lemma for groups states that a group G is isomorphic to a semidirect product of the two groups N and H if and only if there exists a short exact sequence
and a group homomorphism γ : H → G such that, the identity map on H. In this case, : H → Aut(N) is given by (h) = h, where
If is the trivial homomorphism, sending every element of H to the identity automorphism of N, then is the direct product .
Read more about this topic: Semidirect Product
Famous quotes containing the words products and/or group:
“Isnt it odd that networks accept billions of dollars from advertisers to teach people to use products and then proclaim that children arent learning about violence from their steady diet of it on television!”
—Toni Liebman (20th century)
“[The Republicans] offer ... a detailed agenda for national renewal.... [On] reducing illegitimacy ... the state will use ... funds for programs to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies, to promote adoption, to establish and operate childrens group homes, to establish and operate residential group homes for unwed mothers, or for any purpose the state deems appropriate. None of the taxpayer funds may be used for abortion services or abortion counseling.”
—Newt Gingrich (b. 1943)