The Hilbert Space Representation Theorem
This theorem establishes an important connection between a Hilbert space and its (continuous) dual space: if the underlying field is the real numbers, the two are isometrically isomorphic; if the field is the complex numbers, the two are isometrically anti-isomorphic. The (anti-) isomorphism is a particular natural one as will be described next.
Let H be a Hilbert space, and let H* denote its dual space, consisting of all continuous linear functionals from H into the field R or C. If x is an element of H, then the function φx, defined by
where denotes the inner product of the Hilbert space, is an element of H*. The Riesz representation theorem states that every element of H* can be written uniquely in this form.
Theorem. The mapping Φ: H → H* defined by Φ(x) = φx is an isometric (anti-) isomorphism, meaning that:
- Φ is bijective.
- The norms of x and Φ(x) agree: .
- Φ is additive: .
- If the base field is R, then for all real numbers λ.
- If the base field is C, then for all complex numbers λ, where denotes the complex conjugation of λ.
The inverse map of Φ can be described as follows. Given an element φ of H*, the orthogonal complement of the kernel of φ is a one-dimensional subspace of H. Take a non-zero element z in that subspace, and set . Then Φ(x) = φ.
Historically, the theorem is often attributed simultaneously to Riesz and Fréchet in 1907 (see references).
In the mathematical treatment of quantum mechanics, the theorem can be seen as a justification for the popular bra-ket notation. When the theorem holds, every ket has a corresponding bra, and the correspondence is unambiguous.
Read more about this topic: Riesz Representation Theorem
Famous quotes containing the words space and/or theorem:
“True spoiling is nothing to do with what a child owns or with amount of attention he gets. he can have the major part of your income, living space and attention and not be spoiled, or he can have very little and be spoiled. It is not what he gets that is at issue. It is how and why he gets it. Spoiling is to do with the family balance of power.”
—Penelope Leach (20th century)
“To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.”
—Albert Camus (19131960)