Construction Programme
| Pennant | Name | (a) Hull builder (b) Main machinery manufacturers |
Ordered | Laid down | Launched | Accepted into service |
Commissioned | Decommissioned | Estimated building cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S22 | Resolution | (a) Vickers Ltd, Shipbuilding Group, Barrow-in-Furness (b) Vickers Ltd, Engineering Group, Barrow-in-Furness (b) English Electric Co Ltd (turbines) (b) Rolls Royce and Associates Ltd. |
May 1963 | 26 February 1964 | 15 September 1966 | October 1967 | 2 October 1967 | 22 October 1994 | £40,240,000 |
| S23 | Repulse | (a) Vickers Ltd, Shipbuilding Group, Barrow-in-Furness (b) Vickers Ltd, Engineering Group, Barrow-in-Furness (b) English Electric Co Ltd (turbines). |
May 1963 | 12 March 1965 | 4 November 1967 | October 1968 | 28 September 1968 | 1996 | £37,500,000 |
| S26 | Renown | (a) Cammell Laird & Co (Shipbuilders and Engineers) Ltd, Birkenhead (b) Vickers Ltd, Engineering Group, Barrow-in-Furness (b) English Electric Co Ltd (turbines). |
May 1963 | 25 June 1964 | 25 February 1967 | December 1968 | 15 November 1968 | 1996 | £39,950,000 |
| S27 | Revenge | (a) Cammell Laird & Co (Shipbuilders and Engineers) Ltd, Birkenhead (b) Vickers Ltd, Engineering Group, Barrow-in-Furness (b) English Electric Co Ltd (turbines). |
May 1963 | 19 May 1965 | 15 March 1968 | December 1969 | 4 December 1969 | May 1992 | £38,600,000 |
| Ramillies | Cancelled 1965. | ||||||||
Read more about this topic: Resolution Class Submarine
Famous quotes containing the words construction and/or programme:
“There is, I think, no point in the philosophy of progressive education which is sounder than its emphasis upon the importance of the participation of the learner in the formation of the purposes which direct his activities in the learning process, just as there is no defect in traditional education greater than its failure to secure the active cooperation of the pupil in construction of the purposes involved in his studying.”
—John Dewey (1859–1952)
“The idealist’s programme of political or economic reform may be impracticable, absurd, demonstrably ridiculous; but it can never be successfully opposed merely by pointing out that this is the case. A negative opposition cannot be wholly effectual: there must be a competing idealism; something must be offered that is not only less objectionable but more desirable.”
—Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929)