Representations of Quivers
A representation V of a quiver Q is said to be trivial if V(x) = 0 for all vertices x in Q.
A morphism, ƒ : V → V', between representations of the quiver Q, is a collection of linear maps such that for every arrow a in Q from x to y, i.e. the squares that ƒ forms with the arrows of V and V' all commute. A morphism, ƒ, is an isomorphism, if ƒ(x) is invertible for all vertices x in the quiver. With these definitions the representations of a quiver form a category.
If V and W are representations of a quiver Q, then the direct sum of these representations, is defined by for all vertices x in Q and is the direct sum of the linear mappings V(a) and W(a).
A representation is said to be decomposable if it is isomorphic to the direct sum of non-zero representations.
A categorical definition of a quiver representation can also be given. The quiver itself can be considered a category, where the vertices are objects and paths are morphisms. Then a representation of Q is just a covariant functor from this category to the category of finite dimensional vector spaces. Morphisms of representations of Q are precisely natural transformations between the corresponding functors.
For a finite quiver Γ (a quiver with finitely many vertices and edges), let KΓ be its path algebra. Let ei denote the trivial path at vertex i. Then we can associate to the vertex i, the projective KΓ module KΓei consisting of linear combinations of paths which have starting vertex i. This corresponds to the representation of Γ obtained by putting a copy of K at each vertex which lies on a path starting at i and 0 on each other vertex. To each edge joining two copies of K we associate the identity map.
Read more about this topic: Quiver (mathematics)
Famous quotes containing the words representations of and/or quivers:
“Dreams are distorted representations of desire. So are dream- analyses.”
—Mason Cooley (b. 1927)
“Man is a jelly which quivers so much as to run about.”
—Samuel Butler (18351902)