Description
Question P was approved by the voters of Baltimore, Maryland, United States, in November 2002. Simply stated, the ballot initiative proposed "that the City Council consists of 14 members, each to be elected from a different district, and a Council President, to be elected Citywide." Baltimore had 18 council members, thus, the question would have reduced the size of local government.
The effort to gather signatures to put Question P on the ballot, in the first place, was spearheaded by a grassroots political action coalition that included Community and Labor United for Baltimore (CLUB), the Baltimore Green Party, the Baltimore office of ACORN and state delegates Curt Anderson and Jill P. Carter. No other elected officials supported the measure. Prior to the vote on question P, the Baltimore City Council attempted a last-ditch, back room maneuver to confuse voters and derail Question P: Question Q. Question Q would have also restructured the City Council; but question Q was struck down by the courts as not being in compliance with the City's open meeting laws. Question P eventually passed with 67 percent of the vote, despite the disapproval of City Council President Sheila Dixon and Mayor Martin O'Malley.
The affirmation of Question P shrank and reshaped the Baltimore City Council from 6 three-member districts to 14 single-member districts or from 18 members to 14 members. The council president continued to be elected at-large. The changes were meant to make it easier for less-established candidates to run and win; however, none did in the 2004 election, the first held under the new arrangements. Several incumbent council members did lose their seats, since fewer seats were available; Mary Pat Clarke, the only non-incumbent to win a seat, was a well-established Baltimore political figure who had served as the president of the city council and had been a candidate for mayor in 1995.
Read more about this topic: Question P
Famous quotes containing the word description:
“The next Augustan age will dawn on the other side of the Atlantic. There will, perhaps, be a Thucydides at Boston, a Xenophon at New York, and, in time, a Virgil at Mexico, and a Newton at Peru. At last, some curious traveller from Lima will visit England and give a description of the ruins of St. Paul’s, like the editions of Balbec and Palmyra.”
—Horace Walpole (1717–1797)
“The great object in life is Sensation—to feel that we exist, even though in pain; it is this “craving void” which drives us to gaming, to battle, to travel, to intemperate but keenly felt pursuits of every description whose principal attraction is the agitation inseparable from their accomplishment.”
—George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)
“Whose are the truly labored sentences? From the weak and flimsy periods of the politician and literary man, we are glad to turn even to the description of work, the simple record of the month’s labor in the farmer’s almanac, to restore our tone and spirits.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)