Masculine Equivalent
The wife of a king is always a queen, and is usually so called. However, the husband of a queen regnant is not termed "king".
Queen Victoria's husband, Prince Albert, was called "Prince Consort".
However, after the engagement of Charles, Prince of Wales to Camilla Parker-Bowles was announced on 10 February 2005 the official website of the British Monarch and the online FAQ of the Prince of Wales stated, "It is intended that The Duchess of Cornwall will use the title HRH The Princess Consort when The Prince of Wales accedes to The Throne." Whether that remains the case when the Prince of Wales does become king will depend upon public opinion at that time. When asked in an interview by Brian Williams, whether his wife would become queen when he becomes king, the Prince hesitantly replied, "That's, well ... We'll see won't we? That could be."
Unlike the historic monarchies of Europe, the modern British monarchy is a purely statutory institution in which only the monarch him or herself has a formal constitutional role. Such dignities as may be afforded the spouse of the sovereign are matters of custom, not law, although a Statute from the reign of Edward III (1327–1377), makes it high treason to encompass the rape or murder of the king's wife. Under present legislation, the wife of a future British king will legally become queen (consort) upon his accession, regardless of the title by which she might actually be known in public, just as the Duchess of Cornwall is currently actually the Princess of Wales, by virtue of being married to the Prince of Wales, although she does not use the title.
Read more about this topic: Queen Consort
Famous quotes containing the words masculine and/or equivalent:
“They who say that women do not desire the right of suffrage, that they prefer masculine domination to self-government, falsify every page of history, every fact in human experience. It has taken the whole power of the civil and canon law to hold woman in the subordinate position which it is said she willingly accepts.”
—Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815–1902)
“Perhaps basketball and poetry have just a few things in common, but the most important is the possibility of transcendence. The opposite is labor. In writing, every writer knows when he or she is laboring to achieve an effect. You want to get from here to there, but find yourself willing it, forcing it. The equivalent in basketball is aiming your shot, a kind of strained and usually ineffective purposefulness. What you want is to be in some kind of flow, each next moment a discovery.”
—Stephen Dunn (b. 1939)