Mathematical Description
A simple mathematical model for a quasispecies is as follows: let there be possible sequences and let there be organisms with sequence i. Let's say that each of these organisms asexually gives rise to offspring. Some are duplicates of their parent, having sequence i, but some are mutant and have some other sequence. Let the mutation rate correspond to the probability that a j type parent will produce an i type organism. Then the expected number of i type organisms produced by any j type parent is ,
where .
Then the total number of i-type organisms after the first round of reproduction, given as, is
Sometimes a death rate term is included so that:
where is equal to 1 when i=j and is zero otherwise. Note that the n-th generation can be found by just taking the n-th power of W substituting it in place of W in the above formula.
This is just a system of linear equations. The usual way to solve such a system is to first diagonalize the W matrix. Its diagonal entries will be eigenvalues corresponding to certain linear combinations of certain subsets of sequences which will be eigenvectors of the W matrix. These subsets of sequences are the quasispecies. Assuming that the matrix W is irreducible, then after very many generations only the eigenvector with the largest eigenvalue will prevail, and it is this quasispecies that will eventually dominate. The components of this eigenvector give the relative abundance of each sequence at equilibrium.
Read more about this topic: Quasispecies Model
Famous quotes containing the words mathematical and/or description:
“An accurate charting of the American woman’s progress through history might look more like a corkscrew tilted slightly to one side, its loops inching closer to the line of freedom with the passage of time—but like a mathematical curve approaching infinity, never touching its goal. . . . Each time, the spiral turns her back just short of the finish line.”
—Susan Faludi (20th century)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (1886–1965)