Quantum Mechanical Bell Test Prediction - Demonstration of A Bell Inequality Violation

Demonstration of A Bell Inequality Violation

Now choose as the orientation angles of the transmission axes

a = 0, a′ = π/4, b = π/8, b′ = 3 π/8.

(6)

Then

EΦ(a, b) = cos 2(π/8) = 0.707,

(7a)

EΦ(a, b′) = cos 2(3π/8) = −0.707,

(7b)

EΦ(a′, b) = cos 2(−π/8) = 0.707,

(7c)

and

EΦ(a′, b′) = cos 2(π/8) = 0.707.

(7d)

Therefore the quantum mechanical prediction for the CHSH test statistic is

SΦ = EΦ(a, b) − EΦ(a, b′) + EΦ(a′, b) + EΦ(a′, b′) = 2.828,

(8)

exceeding the CHSH Bell test limit of 2 and thus completing the proof of a version of Bell's Theorem. In fact, all entangled quantum states yield predictions in violation of the inequality, as Gisin (1991) and Popescu and Rohrlich (1992) have independently demonstrated. Popescu and Rohrlich (1992) also show that the maximum amount of violation is achieved with a quantum state of maximum degree of entanglement, exemplified by |Φ> of Eq. (1).

Read more about this topic:  Quantum Mechanical Bell Test Prediction

Famous quotes containing the words bell, inequality and/or violation:

    “In 1862 the congregation of the church forwarded the church bell to General Beauregard to be melted into cannon, “hoping that its gentle tones, that have so often called us to the House of God, may be transmuted into war’s resounding rhyme to repel the ruthless invader from the beautiful land God, in his goodness, has given us.””
    —Federal Writers’ Project Of The Wor, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)

    “All the aspects of this desert are beautiful, whether you behold it in fair weather or foul, or when the sun is just breaking out after a storm, and shining on its moist surface in the distance, it is so white, and pure, and level, and each slight inequality and track is so distinctly revealed; and when your eyes slide off this, they fall on the ocean.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “There is all the difference in the world between the criminal’s avoiding the public eye and the civil disobedient’s taking the law into his own hands in open defiance. This distinction between an open violation of the law, performed in public, and a clandestine one is so glaringly obvious that it can be neglected only by prejudice or ill will.”
    —Hannah Arendt (1906–1975)