Quantum Mechanical Bell Test Prediction - Demonstration of A Bell Inequality Violation

Demonstration of A Bell Inequality Violation

Now choose as the orientation angles of the transmission axes

a = 0, a′ = π/4, b = π/8, b′ = 3 π/8.

(6)

Then

EΦ(a, b) = cos 2(π/8) = 0.707,

(7a)

EΦ(a, b′) = cos 2(3π/8) = −0.707,

(7b)

EΦ(a′, b) = cos 2(−π/8) = 0.707,

(7c)

and

EΦ(a′, b′) = cos 2(π/8) = 0.707.

(7d)

Therefore the quantum mechanical prediction for the CHSH test statistic is

SΦ = EΦ(a, b) − EΦ(a, b′) + EΦ(a′, b) + EΦ(a′, b′) = 2.828,

(8)

exceeding the CHSH Bell test limit of 2 and thus completing the proof of a version of Bell's Theorem. In fact, all entangled quantum states yield predictions in violation of the inequality, as Gisin (1991) and Popescu and Rohrlich (1992) have independently demonstrated. Popescu and Rohrlich (1992) also show that the maximum amount of violation is achieved with a quantum state of maximum degree of entanglement, exemplified by |Φ> of Eq. (1).

Read more about this topic:  Quantum Mechanical Bell Test Prediction

Famous quotes containing the words bell, inequality and/or violation:

    “You owe me ten shillings,
    Say the bells of St. Helen’s.
    When will you pay me?
    Say the bells of Old Bailey.
    When I grow rich,
    Say the bells of Shoreditch.
    Pray when will that be?
    Say the bells of Stepney.
    I am sure I don’t know,
    Says the great bell of Bow.”
    —Unknown. The Bells of London (l. 13–22)

    “All the aspects of this desert are beautiful, whether you behold it in fair weather or foul, or when the sun is just breaking out after a storm, and shining on its moist surface in the distance, it is so white, and pure, and level, and each slight inequality and track is so distinctly revealed; and when your eyes slide off this, they fall on the ocean.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “The urgent consideration of the public safety may undoubtedly authorise the violation of every positive law. How far that or any other consideration may operate to dissolve the natural obligations of humanity and justice, is a doctrine of which I still desire to remain ignorant.”
    —Edward Gibbon (1737–1794)