Consequences in Machine Architecture
Use of a PC that normally increments assumes that what a computer does is execute a usually linear sequence of instructions. Such a PC (or equivalent hardware that serves the same purpose) is central to the von Neumann architecture. Thus programmers write a sequential control flow even for algorithms that do not have to be sequential. The resulting “von Neumann bottleneck” led to research into parallel computing, including non-von Neumann or dataflow models that did not use a PC; for example, rather than specifying sequential steps, the high-level programmer might specify desired function and the low-level programmer might specify this using combinatory logic.
This research also led to ways to making conventional, PC-based, CPUs run faster, including:
- Pipelining, in which different hardware in the CPU executes different phases of multiple instructions simultaneously.
- The very long instruction word (VLIW) architecture, where a single instruction can achieve multiple effects.
- Techniques to predict out-of-order execution and prepare subsequent instructions for execution outside the regular sequence.
Read more about this topic: Program Counter
Famous quotes containing the words consequences, machine and/or architecture:
“The middle years are ones in which children increasingly face conflicts on their own,... One of the truths to be faced by parents during this period is that they cannot do the work of living and relating for their children. They can be sounding boards and they can probe with the children the consequences of alternative actions.”
—Dorothy H. Cohen (20th century)
“Goodbye, boys; I’m under arrest. I may have to go to jail. I may not see you for a long time. Keep up the fight! Don’t surrender! Pay no attention to the injunction machine at Parkersburg. The Federal judge is a scab anyhow. While you starve he plays golf. While you serve humanity, he serves injunctions for the money powers.”
—Mother Jones (1830–1930)
“It seems a fantastic paradox, but it is nevertheless a most important truth, that no architecture can be truly noble which is not imperfect.”
—John Ruskin (1819–1900)