Principal Bundle - Formal Definition

Formal Definition

A principal G-bundle, where G denotes any topological group, is a fiber bundle π : PX together with a continuous right action P × GP such that G preserves the fibers of P and acts freely and transitively on them. This implies that the fiber of the bundle is homeomorphic to the group G itself. Frequently, one requires the base space X to be Hausdorff and possibly paracompact.

Since the group action preserves the fibers of π : PX and acts transitively, it follows that the orbits of the G-action are precisely these fibers and the orbit space P/G is homeomorphic to the base space X. Because the action is free, the fibers have the structure of G-torsors. A G-torsor is a space which is homeomorphic to G but lacks a group structure since there is no preferred choice of an identity element.

An equivalent definition of a principal G-bundle is as a G-bundle π : PX with fiber G where the structure group acts on the fiber by left multiplication. Since right multiplication by G on the fiber commutes with the action of the structure group, there exists an invariant notion of right multiplication by G on P. The fibers of π then become right G-torsors for this action.

The definitions above are for arbitrary topological spaces. One can also define principal G-bundles in the category of smooth manifolds. Here π : PX is required to be a smooth map between smooth manifolds, G is required to be a Lie group, and the corresponding action on P should be smooth.

Read more about this topic:  Principal Bundle

Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or definition:

    The conviction that the best way to prepare children for a harsh, rapidly changing world is to introduce formal instruction at an early age is wrong. There is simply no evidence to support it, and considerable evidence against it. Starting children early academically has not worked in the past and is not working now.
    David Elkind (20th century)

    Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.
    Walter Pater (1839–1894)