Criticisms of Primary Health Care and The Alma Ata Declaration
Though many countries were keen on the idea of primary health care -health for all- after the Alma Ata conference took place, it became a difficult task. The declaration itself was criticized for being too “idealistic”, and “having an unrealistic time table” as stated by Marcos Cueto in his article “The ORIGINS of Primary Health Care and Selective Health Care”. Primary Health Care was too broad and goals set up at the conference seemed insignificantly far, “Health for All by 2000” was agreeably unattainable. In 1979, just a year later, the Rockefeller Foundation held a small conference named the “Health and Population in Development” in Italy. This meeting, in connection to the previous one at Alma Ata, was to put the health of the people in regards to its population as population control and family planning played a big roll in health care. This conference was based on a paper published by Julia A. Walsh and Kenneth S. Warren “Selective primary health care: An interim strategy for disease control in developing countries.” The article proposed that until we can achieve primary health care for all, the most effective way to provide health care for a population is to select the diseases to target that creates the greatest mortality and morbidity in a population. They assess the diseases to control based on the following four factors: prevalence, morbidity, mortality and feasibility of control (cost-effectiveness). ] Thus upbringing a more specific approach - Selective Primary Health Care. Primary Health Care was introduced in Africa after 1978. The primary health care system has been extended into isolated rural areas through construction of health posts and centers that offer basic maternal-child health, immunization, nutrition, first aid, and referral services.
Read more about this topic: Primary Health Care
Famous quotes containing the words criticisms of, criticisms, primary, health, care and/or declaration:
“I have no concern with any economic criticisms of the communist system; I cannot enquire into whether the abolition of private property is expedient or advantageous. But I am able to recognize that the psychological premises on which the system is based are an untenable illusion. In abolishing private property we deprive the human love of aggression of one of its instruments ... but we have in no way altered the differences in power and influence which are misused by aggressiveness.”
—Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)
“I have no concern with any economic criticisms of the communist system; I cannot enquire into whether the abolition of private property is expedient or advantageous. But I am able to recognize that the psychological premises on which the system is based are an untenable illusion. In abolishing private property we deprive the human love of aggression of one of its instruments ... but we have in no way altered the differences in power and influence which are misused by aggressiveness.”
—Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)
“Without the Constitution and the Union, we could not have attained the result; but even these, are not the primary cause of our great prosperity. There is something back of these, entwining itself more closely about the human heart. That something, is the principle of “Liberty to all”Mthe principle that clears the path for all—gives hope to all—and, by consequence, enterprize [sic], and industry to all.”
—Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
“Nothing in Nature’s sober found,
But an eternal health goes round.
Fill up the bowl, then, fill it high,
Fill all the glasses there—for why
Should every creature drink but I?
Why, man of morals, tell me why?”
—Abraham Cowley (1618–1667)
“Jefferson Smith: I hate to stand here and try your patience like this, but either I’m dead right or I’m crazy.
Senator MacPherson: You wouldn’t care to put that to a vote, would you, Senator?”
—Sidney Buchman (1902–1975)
“[The Declaration of Independence] meant to set up a standard maxim for free society, which should be familiar to all, and revered by all; constantly looked to, constantly labored for, and even though never perfectly attained, constantly approximated, and thereby constantly spreading and deepening its influence, and augmenting the happiness and value of life to all people of all colors everywhere.”
—Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)