Criticisms of Primary Health Care and The Alma Ata Declaration
Though many countries were keen on the idea of primary health care -health for all- after the Alma Ata conference took place, it became a difficult task. The declaration itself was criticized for being too “idealistic”, and “having an unrealistic time table” as stated by Marcos Cueto in his article “The ORIGINS of Primary Health Care and Selective Health Care”. Primary Health Care was too broad and goals set up at the conference seemed insignificantly far, “Health for All by 2000” was agreeably unattainable. In 1979, just a year later, the Rockefeller Foundation held a small conference named the “Health and Population in Development” in Italy. This meeting, in connection to the previous one at Alma Ata, was to put the health of the people in regards to its population as population control and family planning played a big roll in health care. This conference was based on a paper published by Julia A. Walsh and Kenneth S. Warren “Selective primary health care: An interim strategy for disease control in developing countries.” The article proposed that until we can achieve primary health care for all, the most effective way to provide health care for a population is to select the diseases to target that creates the greatest mortality and morbidity in a population. They assess the diseases to control based on the following four factors: prevalence, morbidity, mortality and feasibility of control (cost-effectiveness). ] Thus upbringing a more specific approach - Selective Primary Health Care. Primary Health Care was introduced in Africa after 1978. The primary health care system has been extended into isolated rural areas through construction of health posts and centers that offer basic maternal-child health, immunization, nutrition, first aid, and referral services.
Read more about this topic: Primary Health Care
Famous quotes containing the words criticisms of, criticisms, primary, health, care and/or declaration:
“The sway of alcohol over mankind is unquestionably due to its power to stimulate the mystical faculties of human nature, usually crushed to earth by the cold facts and dry criticisms of the sober hour. Sobriety diminishes, discriminates, and says no; drunkenness expands, unites, and says yes.”
—William James (1842–1910)
“I have no concern with any economic criticisms of the communist system; I cannot enquire into whether the abolition of private property is expedient or advantageous. But I am able to recognize that the psychological premises on which the system is based are an untenable illusion. In abolishing private property we deprive the human love of aggression of one of its instruments ... but we have in no way altered the differences in power and influence which are misused by aggressiveness.”
—Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)
“The primary function of myth is to validate an existing social order. Myth enshrines conservative social values, raising tradition on a pedestal. It expresses and confirms, rather than explains or questions, the sources of cultural attitudes and values.... Because myth anchors the present in the past it is a sociological charter for a future society which is an exact replica of the present one.”
—Ann Oakley (b. 1944)
“I hold it that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.... It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government.”
—Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826)
“Americans will listen, but they do not care to read. War and Peace must wait for the leisure of retirement, which never really comes: meanwhile it helps to furnish the living room. Blockbusting fiction is bought as furniture. Unread, it maintains its value. Read, it looks like money wasted. Cunningly, Americans know that books contain a person, and they want the person, not the book.”
—Anthony Burgess (b. 1917)
“Ignorance, forgetfulness, or contempt of the rights of man are the only causes of public misfortunes and of the corruption of governments.”
—French National Assembly. Declaration of the Rights of Man (drafted and discussed Aug. 1789, published Sept. 1791)