Definition of The Notation
The following types of Euclidean transformation can occur in a group described by orbifold notation:
- reflection through a line (or plane)
- translation by a vector
- rotation of finite order around a point
- infinite rotation around a line in 3-space
- glide-reflection, i.e. reflection followed by translation.
All translations which occur are assumed to form a discrete subgroup of the group symmetries being described.
Each group is denoted in orbifold notation by a finite string made up from the following symbols:
- positive integers
- the infinity symbol,
- the asterisk, *
- the symbol (a solid circle in older documents), which is called a wonder
- the symbol (an open circle in older documents), which is called a miracle.
A string written in boldface represents a group of symmetries of Euclidean 3-space. A string not written in boldface represents a group of symmetries of the Euclidean plane, which is assumed to contain two independent translations.
Each symbol corresponds to a distinct transformation:
- an integer n to the left of an asterisk indicates a rotation of order n around a point
- an integer n to the right of an asterisk indicates a transformation of order 2n which rotates around a point and reflects through a line (or plane)
- an x indicates a glide reflection
- the symbol indicates infinite rotational symmetry around a line; it can only occur for bold face groups. By abuse of language, we might say that such a group is a subgroup of symmetries of the Euclidean plane with only one independent translation. The frieze groups occur in this way.
- the exceptional symbol o indicates that there are precisely two linearly independent translations.
Read more about this topic: Orbifold Notation
Famous quotes containing the words definition of and/or definition:
“It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possessafter many mysterieswhat one loves.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (16131680)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (18391894)