Operation Upshot-Knothole was a series of eleven nuclear test shots conducted in 1953 at the Nevada Test Site.
Over twenty-one thousand soldiers took part in the ground exercise Desert Rock V in conjunction with the Grable shot. Grable was a 280mm shell fired from the “Atomic Cannon” and was viewed by a number of high-ranking military officials.
Operation Upshot-Knothole followed Operation Ivy and preceded Operation Castle. The test series was notable as containing the first time an atomic artillery shell was fired (Shot Grable), the first two shots (both fizzles) by University of California Radiation Laboratory—Livermore (now Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), and for testing out some of the thermonuclear components that would be used for the massive thermonuclear series of Operation Castle.
The individual shots were:
Test name | Date | Location | Yield | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|
Annie | 17 March 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 16 kilotons | |
Nancy | 24 March 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 24 kilotons | |
Ruth | 31 March 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 0.2 kilotons | First UCRL device, uranium hydride device, fizzle |
Dixie | 6 April 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 11 kilotons | |
Ray | 11 April 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 0.2 kilotons | Second UCRL device, uranium hydride device, fizzle |
Badger | 18 April 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 23 kilotons | |
Simon | 25 April 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 43 kilotons | |
Encore | 8 May 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 27 kilotons | |
Harry | 19 May 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 32 kilotons | Extreme contamination of downwinders |
Grable | 25 May 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 15 kilotons | nuclear artillery, gun-type fission weapon |
Climax | 4 June 1953 | Nevada Test Site | 61 kilotons |
Famous quotes containing the word operation:
“You may read any quantity of books, and you may almost as ignorant as you were at starting, if you dont have, at the back of your minds, the change for words in definite images which can only be acquired through the operation of your observing faculties on the phenomena of nature.”
—Thomas Henry Huxley (182595)