Theoretical Definition
A function f: {0, 1}* → {0, 1}* is one-way if f can be computed by a polynomial time algorithm, but for every randomized algorithm A which runs in time polynomial in |x|, every polynomial p(n), and all sufficiently large n
where the probability is over the choice of x from the uniform distribution on {0, 1}n, and the randomness of A.
Note that, by this definition, the function must be "hard to invert" in the average-case, rather than worst-case sense. This is different from much of complexity theory (e.g., NP-hardness), where the term "hard" is meant in the worst-case.
It is not sufficient to make a function "lossy" (not one-to-one) to have a one-way function. In particular, the function which outputs the string of n zeros on any input of length n is not a one-way function. The reason is that an algorithm A which just outputs any string of length n on input f(x) does find a proper preimage of the output, even if it is not the input which was originally used to find the output string.
Read more about this topic: One-way Function
Famous quotes containing the words theoretical and/or definition:
“There are theoretical reformers at all times, and all the world over, living on anticipation.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)