Basis and Local Influences
Old Church Slavonic is evidenced by a relatively small body of manuscripts, most of which were written in First Bulgarian Empire during the late 10th and the early 11th centuries. The language has a Southern Slavic basis with an admixture of Western Slavic features inherited during the mission of Saints Cyril and Methodius to Great Moravia (863–885). The only well-preserved manuscript of the Moravian recension, the Kiev Folia, is characterised by the replacement of some Southern Slavic phonetic and lexical features with Western Slavic ones. Manuscripts written in the Second Bulgarian Empire have, on the other hand, few Western Slavic features.
Old Church Slavonic is valuable to historical linguists since it preserves archaic features believed to have once been common to all Slavic languages. Some of these features are:
- Nasal vowels: /ɛ̃/ and /ɔ̃/;
- Extra-short vowels: /ĭ/ and /ŭ/. Sometimes known as a "pseudo-vowel", a word final non-syllabic vowel that is often reduced in quick speech to a velarisation or pharyngisation (respectively) of the preceding consonant often accompanied with aspiration;
- Near-open articulation of the yat vowel (/æ/);
- Palatal consonants /ɲ/ and /ʎ/ from Proto-Slavic *ń and *ĺ;
- Proto-Slavic declension system based on stem endings (so-called o-stems, jo-stems, a-stems and ja-stems);
- Aorist, imperfect, Proto-Slavic paradigms for participles and other features were preserved.
The Southern Slavic nature of the language is evident from the following variations:
- Phonetic:
- /ra/ → /la/ by means of liquid metathesis of Proto-Slavic *or, *ol clusters
- /s/ from the Proto-Slavic *x before *ąi
- /tsv/ and /dzv/ from the Proto-Slavic *kv', *gv'
- morphosyntactic use of the dative possessive case in personal pronouns and nouns: 'рѫка ти' (rǫka ti, "your hand"), 'отъпѹщенье грѣхомъ' (otŭpuštenĭje grěxomŭ, "remission of sins"); periphrastic future tense using the verb 'хотѣти' (xotěti, "to want"); use of the comparative form 'мьнии' (mĭniji, "smaller") to denote "younger".
- morphosyntactic use of suffixed demonstrative pronouns 'тъ, та, то' (tŭ, ta, to). In Bulgarian and Macedonian these developed into suffixed definite articles.
Old Church Slavonic has some extra features in common with Bulgarian:
- Near-open articulation of the Yat vowel (ě); still preserved in the Bulgarian dialects of the Rhodope mountains;
- The existence of /ʃt/ and /ʒd/ as reflexes of Proto-Slavic *tj and *dj or *gt and *kt before front vowels.
- Use of possessive dative for personal pronouns and nouns, as in 'братъ ми' (bratŭ mi, "my brother"), 'рѫка ти' (rǫka ti, "your hand"), 'отъпѹщенье грѣхомъ' (otŭpuštenĭje grěxomŭ, "remission of sins"), 'храмъ молитвѣ' (xramŭ molitvě, 'house of prayer'), etc.
- Periphrastic compound future tense formed with the auxiliary verb 'хотѣти' (xotěti, "to want"), for example 'хоштѫ писати' (xoštǫ pisati, "I will write").
| Proto-Slavic | OCS | Bulg. | Czech | Maced. | Pol. | Rus. | Slovak | Sloven. | Cro./Serb. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *dʲ | ʒd | ʒd | z | ɟ | dz | ʑ | dz | j | dʑ |
| *tʲ | ʃt | ʃt | ts | c | ts | tɕ | ts | tʃ | tɕ |
| *ɡt/kt | ʃt | ʃt | ts | c | ts | tɕ | ts | tʃ | tɕ |
Read more about this topic: Old Church Slavonic
Famous quotes containing the words basis, local and/or influences:
“The basis of shame is not some personal mistake of ours, but the ignominy, the humiliation we feel that we must be what we are without any choice in the matter, and that this humiliation is seen by everyone.”
—Milan Kundera (b. 1929)
“The poets eye, in a fine frenzy rolling,
Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven;
And as imagination bodies forth
The forms of things unknown, the poets pen
Turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.”
—William Shakespeare (15641616)
“Leadership does not always wear the harness of compromise. Once and again one of those great influences which we call a Cause arises in the midst of a nation. Men of strenuous minds and high ideals come forward.... The attacks they sustain are more cruel than the collision of arms.... Friends desert and despise them.... They stand alone and oftentimes are made bitter by their isolation.... They are doing nothing less than defy public opinion, and shall they convert it by blows. Yes.”
—Woodrow Wilson (18561924)