Nowhere Dense Sets With Positive Measure
A nowhere dense set is not necessarily negligible in every sense. For example, if X is the unit interval, not only is it possible to have a dense set of Lebesgue measure zero (such as the set of rationals), but it is also possible to have a nowhere dense set with positive measure.
For one example (a variant of the Cantor set), remove from all dyadic fractions, i.e. fractions of the form a/2n in lowest terms for positive integers a and n, and the intervals around them: (a/2n − 1/22n+1, a/2n + 1/22n+1). Since for each n this removes intervals adding up to at most 1/2n+1, the nowhere dense set remaining after all such intervals have been removed has measure of at least 1/2 (in fact just over 0.535... because of overlaps) and so in a sense represents the majority of the ambient space . This set nowhere dense, as it is closed and has an empty interior: any interval (a, b) is not contained in the set since the dyadic fractions in (a, b) have been removed.
Generalizing this method, one can construct in the unit interval nowhere dense sets of any measure less than 1.
Read more about this topic: Nowhere Dense Set
Famous quotes containing the words dense, sets, positive and/or measure:
“In some of those dense fir and spruce woods there is hardly room for the smoke to go up. The trees are a standing night, and every fir and spruce which you fell is a plume plucked from nights raven wing.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“Willing sets you free: that is the true doctrine of will and freedomthus Zarathustra instructs you.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (18441900)
“I have always had something to live besides a personal life. And I suspected very early that to live merely in an experience of, in an expression of, in a positive delight in the human cliches could be no business of mine.”
—Margaret Anderson (18861973)
“Trying to love your children equally is a losing battle. Your childrens scorecards will never match your own. No matter how meticulously you measure and mete out your love and attention, and material gifts, it will never feel truly equal to your children. . . . Your children will need different things at different times, and true equality wont really serve their different needs very well, anyway.”
—Marianne E. Neifert (20th century)