Modern Winchester Notions
Although many of the old notions are used less and less frequently by Wykehamists, a more informal slang has grown up in their place. Much of this consists of altering the vowel in a word for facetious or sarcastic effect. Wykehamical vowel-alteration is often accompanied by a High Rising Terminal intonation pattern, which is often encountered in Australian English and the stereotyped Californian Valspeak, but which is relatively rare in the context of standard Southern British English and may wrongly be interpreted as "questioning". Hence it may perhaps best be transcribed "...?!".
Current examples of vowel alteration include:
- This is quat good: This is pretty bad
Further examples still used by Old Wykehamists include:
- Yoi: Obviously no, I don't believe this is true
- Noi: Obviously yes, I definitely agree
The patrony (the act of patronising one's peers) is a central feature of Wykehamical interaction. Formerly, a common way to patronise someone was to say to them "Hullo?!" in a throaty nasal voice. The concept of patrony (sic) was later imagined as a form of metaphorical currency, with individuals bidding each other to "take a patrony".
Read more about this topic: Notions (Winchester College)
Famous quotes containing the words modern, winchester and/or notions:
“The critical method which denies literary modernity would appear—and even, in certain respects, would be—the most modern of critical movements.”
—Paul Deman (1919–1983)
“Up from the South at break of day,
Bringing to Winchester fresh dismay,
The affrighted air with a shudder bore,
Like a herald in haste, to the chieftain’s door,
The terrible grumble, and rumble, and roar,
Telling the battle was on once more,
And Sheridan twenty miles away.”
—Thomas Buchanan Read (1822–1872)
“What is termed Sin is an essential element of progress. Without it the world would stagnate, or grow old, or become colourless. By its curiosity Sin increases the experience of the race. Through its intensified assertion of individualism it saves us from monotony of type. In its rejection of the current notions about morality, it is one with the higher ethics.”
—Oscar Wilde (1854–1900)